Natural Immunity as Good as or Better Than COVID-19 Vaccination: Study

We have the bazillion study proving our own human DNA immune system is superior to everything the nefarious ones can cook up with fake science.

But will it help you fit in socially? WIEED? What is everybody else doing? 🫣🫡

Brownstone Institute

Issue; truth and empowerment for humanity

Remember that earlier this year, there was a concerted attempt on the part of major media and platforms to pretend like lockdowns and vaccine mandates (and medical segregation) never happened. 

What about all this carnage we see around us?

The inflation? That’s Putin, OPEC, and gas stations. 

Learning loss? Oh, one expects that in a pandemic. 

Lost workers? Well, it’s just demographics. 

Excess deaths not related to Covid? Probably drugs or something. 

Crime? It’s a myth. 

Shattered communities? Hey, it happens.

Recession and impending depression? Just part of a cycle. 

Whatever is wrong with this country, it has nothing to do with the late unpleasantness. That was all necessary for health, so quit talking about it. The lockdowns didn’t happen or, if they did happen, it was necessary to protect lives. In any case, let’s please just move on. 

Whatever you do, don’t connect the dots. 

Sadly, too many people wanted to play along with this major effort to sweep everything under the rug. Forget the millions displaced from their jobs. Forget the kids with delayed speech. Forget the missed cancer treatments and other medical diagnostics. What happened had to happen and these are new times. 

Why have so many willing to push the suppression of truth? Simply because so many people were involved in the disaster of lockdowns and jab mandates. They either supported them at the time or said nothing against them. Now they don’t want to talk about it. 

At Brownstone Institute, we’ve made it our mission to connect the dots. We do it every day with the best analysis, research, and commentary. We’ve made all these subjects impossible to ignore. Our thinking is that we have to get this history right, and understand all the cause-and-effect relationships, or we risk repeating the whole calamity under another excuse. 

More than anything else, if we are to re-establish and re-prioritize freedom as a first principle, we absolutely must come to terms with what happened and why. We must make the connections between today’s sufferings – they take so many forms – and the egregious policy responses that began only 31 months ago. 

Too many people, writers, intellectuals, journalists, and politicians want to forget it all. This is how they can avoid accountability and then do it again when they deem it necessary. As the shampoo instructions say, rinse and repeat. 

We simply cannot allow that to happen. Brownstone has emerged as a leading voice to provide the counterbalance. With fully 21 channels of communication, and millions of readers, and reprints in every major language, and venues all over the world where our content runs, and dedicated people who share Brownstone material all day, every day, we have made a huge difference. 

That these issues have emerged with major importance in American public life, and also the world over, doesn’t just happen. It is a consequence of the influence institutions like Brownstone have over the public mind. The ideas must get out there, even when major platforms are working daily to suppress them. 

Another crucial service that Brownstone provides in these diasporic times: this institution has provided sanctuary for writers, researchers, speakers, and scientists to do their work and get their message out. Our recently started Fellows program has been a godsend, for which we thank our donors. 

In fact, Brownstone would not exist at all, much less have the influence it has without generous donors. As we approach the holiday season in these critical times in history, can you please remember the work we do and give with your most generous commitments? So many of you already have and the difference you have made is legion. 

We run on a shoestring budget and so every dime counts. Times are hard for everyone but unless the right ideas penetrate the conspiracy of silence, the times will only get harder. We cannot guarantee success but we know that doing nothing will guarantee failure. 

Please consider supporting Brownstone. If you are already a donor, thank you ever so much. Please continue! If you have never given, please consider that today and in the coming months. 

Our donation form is here. Every effort is greatly appreciated. 

Best to you and yours in this holiday season! Copyright © 2022 Brownstone Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:

Brownstone Institute

2028 E Ben White Blvd # 240-3088

Austin, TX 78741-6966

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

The White Coats Have Given Over Their Healing Power to The State

The bill would put physicians at risk of losing their licenses and being charged with unprofessional conduct for asking questions about the COVID-19 vaccine and recommending alternative treatments.

The article

Since when is the healing power of the light body governed by “licenses” from the state and their uneducated opinion on a healers conduct when they don’t know the first thing about it?

They are politicians. They are the lowest life form on the planet and at every turn show their obecense to shadow, money, illusion, abuse of power and A.I. Since when do they have a relationship with the Universe or believe in any of it?

They believe in USING the human body, not helping it and this is where the white coat alignment with state and the black market health insurance industry, because of THEIR OWN GREED, has hijacked the human mind and body.

Do the angels really compromise with the devil? Can A.I. really co exist with nature? We all keep compromising to see if they save their own souls before they destroy ours. Why?

Brownstone Institute is In Twitter Jail Over Facts on Masking

The day after the CDC decided to declare a truce in the war on Covid, the twenty-somethings running Twitter still haven’t gotten the message. They are on the warpath at the behest of the government. For the first time, Twitter took after Brownstone Institute for an article by a scientist. In this remarkable piece, Carla Peeters explains that most of the symptoms of long Covid can be traced to poisoning from masks themselves. The article is technical but compelling…and Twitter has decided that it should not be seen. 

It’s bizarre because Brownstone has probably run 40 articles on the topic, including the definitive list of academic studies cited the world over. So it goes, but from the beginning, we knew this would be a threat. We’ve already decentralized to build a presence on every other major platform. We’ve also unplugged from the big three as much as possible. We’ve even eschewed Google’s freebies as a way of protecting your privacy. One war seems to end just as so many others have begun. We always knew that this was fundamentally about the Bill of Rights. Some people don’t like it. It’s as simple as that. Thank you as always for supporting our work. Here is some content from this week. Dr. Birx’s Fake Science Revealed in Her Own Words BY DEBBIE LERMAN. In her “excruciating story” of the pandemic, The Silent Spread, Deborah Birx does not even try to make coherent scientific or public health policy arguments in favor of the Chinese-style totalitarian measures she advocated. Instead, she provides nonsensical, self-contradictory assertions – some downright false and others long disproven in the scientific literature.CDC Quietly Ends Differentiation on Covid Vaccination Status BY MICHAEL SENGER. CDC’s COVID-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person’s vaccination statusHow Masking Contributes to Long Covid  BY CARLA PEETERS. A lingering disorder that can last for months or years is affecting an increasing proportion of the workforce. The symptoms that contribute to Long Covid could be a result of pandemic measures and masking in particular. Increased exposure to microplastics, nanoparticles, chemicals in masks, and nasopharyngeal tests parallel many of the symptoms that define Long Covid. Why I Signed the Great Barrington Declaration BY DONALD BOUDREAUX.

The Declaration merely reminded humanity of what was until early 2020 the consensus among public-health officials, including those at the World Health Organization, on the best means of dealing with respiratory pandemics. All the GBD did, really, was to advise that long-standing consensus be regained and followed. The Brutalization of Compassion  BY DAVID MCGROGAN.  During the Covid era, we see the same schema writ large in the responses taken by governments across the globe. For the first time in human history, the availability of mass testing allowed us to convince ourselves that we could measure the health of the population, holistically, in real-time, and generate precise statistics permitting us to do so – right down to the last ‘case’ or ‘death’. 

Did Lockdowns Turn Americans Into Lazy Bums? BY JEFFREY A. TUCKER.  If governments say that the work ethic amounts to nothing but pathogenic spread, and we can all contribute more by staying home and doing less, it’s hard to go back. It wrecked a generation. We are paying the price now. The Disastrous High-Tech War on a Pathogen BY W. AARON VANDIVER.  If we carefully analyze each aspect of the “world war” on Covid-19, we can see how each tactic and high-tech “weapon” has harmed human health, destabilized civil society, and possibly disrupted the ecological balance between the human population and the virus, while enriching private interests and empowering financially captured government regulators. 

Genome sequence of COVID in a cat nearly identical to viral sequences found in people

A matching genome is fairly easy to find on earth throughout all animal and plant species because we’re all part of the web of life, related to one another, including the E.T. Also, humans would not exist without the direct contribution of reptiles and birds in the genome which came from E.T. Mammals evolved from them. And most of the plants on the planet were here before we were. Ferns are an example. They are ancient. There used to be huge fern forests on Earth.

Scientists know that DNA variance among even potatoes and people is slim. But potatoes aren’t sentient, that we know of, (potato smarts?) but we are. So what is creating the difference between species if not DNA? A: Evolving tRNA (transfer RNA) that is dynamic due to free will and changes daily according to the oracles that I cite on this blog.

When I note which amino acid tRNA molecules are moving that day it’s the first time they are moving that way in the current time. They move the way they do every 260 days but because we are changing due to our own choices, (Yellow Human free will), the tRNA which turns into DNA in the nucleus is never the same. Thus our kids are impossible to fathom for us parents. They incarnate in groups with agreed-upon agendas. That much I see in generational groups and the astrologers see it also.

A person born on White 13 Wind in 2022 is not the same as a person born in 2019 as White 13 Wind. The Oracle takes care of sprocketing the 365-day solar year with the 260-day galactic spin. The birthday of the person in 2019 is different than the one in 2022, thus their interplanetary astrological line-up is different, and their personality is different. That’s 4D. Things do level out and start matching up in your Mayan Oracle themeplex because we’re dealing with the upper densities of existence, past DNA with the Oracle.

The Haab

by University of Pennsylvania

Since being identified in people in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has gone on to infect a wide range of animal species, wild and domestic. Concerns abound that these species jumps could lead to novel mutations and even harmful new variants.

In a new report, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Veterinary Medicine and Perelman School of Medicine found that, for at least one example of apparent interspecies transmission, this crossing the species boundary did not cause the virus to gain a significant number of mutations.

Writing in the journal Viruses, the scientists identified a domestic house cat, treated at Penn Vet’s Ryan Hospital, that was infected with the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 subsequent to exposure from its owner. The full genome sequence of the virus was a close match to viral sequences circulating in people in the Philadelphia region at the time.

“SARS-CoV-2 has a really incredibly wide host range,” says Elizabeth Lennon, senior author on the work, a veterinarian, and assistant professor at Penn Vet. “What this means to me is that, as SARS-CoV-2 continues to be prevalent in the human population, we need to watch what’s happening in other animal species as well.”

The find is the first published example of the delta variant occurring in a domestic cat in the United States. Notably, the cat’s infection was only identified by testing its fecal matter. A nasal swab did not result in a positive test.

“This did highlight the importance of sampling at multiple body sites,” says Lennon. “We wouldn’t have detected this if we had just done a nasal swab.”

Lennon and colleagues have been sampling dogs and cats for SARS-CoV-2 since early in the pandemic. This particular pet cat, an 11-year-old female, was brought to Ryan Hospital in September with gastrointestinal symptoms. It had been exposed to an owner who had COVID-19—though that owner had been isolated from the cat for 11 days prior to its hospitalization, another household member doing the cat care in the interim.

Working through the Penn Center for Research on Coronaviruses and Other Emerging Pathogens and Perelman School of Medicine microbiologist Frederic Bushman’s laboratory, the team obtained a whole-genome sequence of the cat’s virus.

Sequencing revealed the delta variant, more specifically, the AY.3 lineage. The researchers did not have a sample from the infected owner. Comparing the sequence to the database kept by the Bushman laboratory, however, the cat’s virus was nothing out of the ordinary in terms of the sequences of SARS-CoV-2 circulating in the Delaware Valley region at the time.

“When we looked at a random sampling of human sequences from our geographic area, there wasn’t anything dramatically different about our cat’s sample,” Lennon says. “So, our takeaway was that the cat was not infected by a virus that was somehow highly different.”

Not all variants of SARS-CoV-2 have been equally able to infect a wide range of hosts. For example, the original Wuhan strain could not naturally infect mice; later variants gained that ability. Scientists began seeing infections in cats and dogs from the early days of the pandemic, presumably infected through close contact with their owners.

“The main takeaway here is that as different variants of SARS-CoV-2 emerge, they seem to be retaining the ability to infect a wide range of species,” Lennon says.

While this particular case does not raise alarms for the virus acquiring significant numbers of mutations as it moved between species, Lennon and colleagues, including Bushman and Susan Weiss of Penn’s medical school, hope to continue studying other examples to see how SARS-CoV-2 evolves. Penn Vet’s Institute for Infectious and Zoonotic Disease will facilitate this look at human-animal interactions when it comes to pathogen transmission.

“We know that the SARS-CoV-2 is undergoing changes as it passes between to become more and more transmissible over time,” says Lennon. “We saw that with the omicron variant. It’s host-adapting to people. We also want to know, when other animal species get infected, does the virus start to adapt to those species? And for those viruses that may adapt to a different species, do they still infect humans?”

Explore further

SARS-CoV-2 is moving between humans and wildlife around the US

Anti-Covid19 v.2

This was originally posted August 26, 2020. Dr. Chavez told me he felt his life was threatened around this time. As of November 21, 2022 I have not heard from him. He had a stroke and asked for me help with looking up treatment which I did. I have not heard from him. It caused blindness. I am very suspicious about what caused his stroke. Dr. Chavez saw my work before I published and was complimentary but probably like many scientists, doesn’t fully understand it yet.

I’ve been in Messenger with Dr. Chavez. I needed to delete my last post by him because he feels his life is threatened. (I JUST SAW THIS! OCT. 27 2021.) There are more details I will not disclose. But I have been allowed to post portions of this paper. It’s 62 pages long and this is just the first 7 pages. Dr. Chavez is a PhD molecular biologist who has studied the CV2 sequence extensively.

I may post another section tomorrow  Enjoy! Lisa

COVID-19: Hypothesis of the Lab Origin versus a Zoonotic Event Which Can Also be of a Lab Origin

By Dr,Fernando Castro-Chavez.[1]


To treat the cause of a disease and not only its effects are of the utmost importance; hence, we need to know the origin of this pandemic of COVID-19, to be able, if possible, to prevent an event of such a nature and magnitude in the future, and to be able to avoid all sorts of abuses to humanity, as is happening right now. Bullet points here addressed are:

1) To have, inside the backbone of a virus from a bat (mostly ~97.55% of the viral RNA (by deducting the HIV inserts found by Perez, Montagnier and others), & as per the findings of Petrovsky, see below, and also to contrast the differences), the insertion similar to that of a pangolin virus for the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD, which basically consists of six separated key amino acids, or the 0.06% of its genome for these particular 18 nucleotides), being their receptor the ACE2 of the human lung, appearing at a time (as earlier as since September of 2019), where there were already mature all of the molecular methodologies necessary to modify individual nucleotides (Crispr-Cas9, “Seamless”, etc.) that then modify at will the resulting amino acids, with the possibility to give an extra passage to the virus through ferrets (or other lab animals) that have an ACE2 very similar to the humans, to give it then a more “natural” appearance (by random trivial changes); because, had it been natural, this could had required an animal host infected with these two viruses simultaneously, and that with an unexplainable marksmanship, to specifically modify the key six codons (and a second independent of such impossible recombinants, to give raise to the differences exclusively present at the end of the long Orf1ab, into the Nsf15 and Nsf16);

2) To have an even more important and unique peculiar site, PRRAR (encompassing the needed 12 bases to complete that sequence, being this the 0.04% of the full genome), for protease cleavage (new to Plasmin and Furin, plus Trypsin, TMRPSS2, etc.) inside the protein called Spike (S), to obtain the fragments S1 and S2 to allow the viral RNA to penetrate the cell (expanding the range, not only to lung cells as the previous modification but also to white and neural cells), whose nucleotides producing it are highly strange to the rest of the viral sequence, because they contain more than an 83% of richness in its nucleotides GC, being these 12 nucleotides alien to the rest of the virus: CCUCGGCGGGCA (similar to bacterial and to methodological sequences patented by Moderna, Inc., cleavable by restriction enzymes BsaJI, AciI, Cac8I, MnlI…), that are engrained to the three remaining bases: CGU present in the frame of the bat virus to complete the necessary sequence.

This will require, either a third virus completely unknown until now, either in the same utopian animal described before, or through a second passage of the first chimera into another animal, and then that such viral beast, could also be able to target exclusively this region, and no other site whatsoever; then, it is explored,

3) The biggest shot in variation, when it is compared to the first sequence obtained of the virus of COVID-19, with its immediate ancestor, that according to Shi Zheng-Li is the RaTG13 (submitted a posteriori of the COVID-19 first sequence, and which researchers demonstrate that this is a partially made-up sequence (see below), having her deliberately ignored even to cite her previous identical reference called BtCoV/4991 (2016), or even her most recent reference of the same that she put under the name of SARSr-CoV Ra4991 (2019), being very dishonest for her to change in at least three identified times the names of her same sequence, actions that render her highly suspicious, because she hid the rest of the sequence at least during the last four year (having been obtained from excrement in a cave, she says. After a call due to a serious case of miners infected at Yunnan. Nobody knows what was inside at least six miners), but her publishing it until now, after the emergence of a similar virus, makes her highly suspicious, rather than making her look innocent. Who can say that she did not manipulate as well artificially such sequence, or that the CCP Chinese military did not do the same to the other two previous sequences that are also somehow similar to Sars-CoV-2?

How many more hundreds of sequences will they be hiding? Nobody independently has been able to verify the accuracy of their claims. Everything is based only on what they say. Given that the nucleotides of six proteins exhibit a 99% of similitude between both sequences, while twelve of them go down to a 96% or even are below of this number, being the most extreme changes, the ones that are inside the sequence for the protein Spike, which while exhibiting a global similitude of 93%, is the one having the highest discrepancy between the two sequences.

Within this same one there are extreme shorter variations, with a low similitude of 44% on that specific of the RBD mentioned before, which goes down to some 17% for the region of those 18 key bases. Only 20% percent for that sequence of 12 bases for the resulting protease cleavage site; other changes include the optimal nucleotides of an even shorter region of 16 segments similar to immunodeficiency genes (plus two more distant ones). Even a couple of concatenated Plasmodium yoelii found by Perez and Montagnier at the S2 place, all that could be better explained with artificial processes already in place to do this and more within the frame of the awful Gain-of-Function sinister and dual-purpose (or double-talk) research.

So, it is their word against the world, and that is why since at least 2010 I have been proposing an independent verification by at least three other labs of results reported, especially by CCP Chinese researchers, as they did cost me already my first job in the US by their lying during at least ten years about a methodological artifact that I called “Palindromati”, and that they kept on reporting as “natural” while receiving grants to explore a chimera.

How much more is it costing their apparent lying about the artificial origin of COVID-19 at this time?) So, all of these points and so much more, because Jesse Morrell, for example, is reaching a set of almost 40 (and counting) pieces of evidence of a lab origin versus cero. Otherwise, things and persons that are leading us to conclude that it is evident to see that there was human intervention in the emergence of this Sars-CoV-2 virus because in 2015-2018 there was not in existence any zoonotic history of any class in Wuhan, so, this virus, having been originated already mature and fully capable to attack the human population, implies an artificial “injecting” source.

“…have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of DARKNESS, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by THEM in secret. But all things that are exposed are made manifest by the LIGHT…” An inspired Paul in Eph. 5:11-13.

Dedicated to Francis S. Collins for the many to be able to see…


A balanced set of voices is needed in this COVID-19 Pandemic, and such is the purpose of this work, to speak the pros and the cons of every claim. I also want to make this presentation a personal one, as scientists tend to simulate isolation of themselves from their research. But in the end, they are still as human as anybody else and their personal bias and experiences always show up.

So, here we will be just another lonely human. Especially within this Pandemic that has tended to “dehumanize” humanity. So, here I am, back to the simplicity of what is meant to be “human” and with feelings.

Three pieces of evidence in science are normally required to establish something as evident (Crombie, 1994). In this case, we will see three minimum reasons, and one more to give a certain range of tolerance (plus another at the beginning, aimed at those with eyes to see), and this will be the determining factor in identifying if COVID-19 is artificial or otherwise, which will show prominently to the reader that this COVID-19 virus is of a human design. Currently, there are zero shreds of evidence in favor of the opposite view.

I hope that other scientists, especially all those honest virologists, immunologists, immunologists, epidemiologists, molecular biologists, human physicians (excluding those “inhumane”), veterinarians, etc., etc., are also doing this kind of vital work, as it is to “define the origin” of this COVID-19 pandemic, which is mainly devastating morally the people of this planet (humans against humans), and needless to say, devastating the infected victims (from all of those tainted statistics that we are all aware of).

It is necessary to know the truth to prevent something like this from happening again, and to prevent a recurrence in the course of the current pandemic, as there is still the slightest chance that more of the same pathogens will continue to be released with the purpose of “escalating” such crisis, which by all accounts has been designed globally, but with the final target of the USA. The fact that an official denial appears in all articles related to the human engineering of COVID-19, saying that: “There is no evidence of it”, indeed speaks volumes about a deliberate attempt to silence the truth, as well as does the unrequested invasion of our privacy by the WHO in all social platform available on the internet, and the censorship by the same WHO under higher orders, of every posting or video that does not agree with the narrative that they pretend to impose over the whole of the human race.

Here, I present then, this minimal evidence that shows just the opposite: That “there is evidence” indeed of a lab-leak, and even further, of an even engineered virus as the most plausible explanation of the current malady, as if planned. This is presented for the free evaluation of the reader.

This work is also an attempt to respond to the most recent question posed in Nature, talking about the WIV of Zheng-Li Shi: “The lab does hold coronaviruses related to SARS-CoV-2, so it is possible that one could have escaped, perhaps if a lab worker accidentally became infected from a virus sample or animal in the facility and then passed it on to someone outside the facility. It is also theoretically possible that scientists at the lab tweaked the virus’s genome for research purposes before it escaped, but, again, there is no evidence that they did. Shi declined to respond to Nature’s questions about her experiments, saying that she has been inundated with media requests” (Cyranoski. 2020) So, Shi, the main suspect in this story is declining to explain her research, however, in what she has published thus far there is vast evidence that COVID-19 may have been designed there at the WIV, the evidence available for anybody willing to dig into her publications. This article wishes to help a little on that aspect.


Most recently, before the release of his second article on the subject, Birger Sørensen declared: “I think it’s more than 90 percent certain. It’s at least a far more probable explanation than it having developed this way in nature” (, where he also explains that the adulterations go beyond the attachment to the human ACE2 receptor (shown in my first point) and, it is within that spirit that I present my current work. So, I name this study “Anticovidian v.2” because it is in line with my previous collective research into Antiobesity (Castro-Chavez et al., 2003) and Antiatherosclerosis (Castro-Chavez et al., 2013), where I also demonstrated, as I hope to do here, that a contaminating laboratory artifact had intruded on thousands of sequences present in the Genbank and even in the Affimetrix Microarrays (Castro-Chavez, 2012). In this viral case, a most basic antecedent I would like to emphasize as many have done, and this is the article by Baric & Zhengli (Zheng-Li) from 2015 (Menachery et al., 2015), published within the time in which Obama had advised a moratorium for such studies, moratorium which lasted in the US from 2014 to 2017, and in the end, it was when, Obama before leaving office indicated its reactivation until the ban was finally lifted by Francis S. Collins (Morrell, 2020). However, in disregard of that ban, these authors managed to continuously publish their work, which again aroused an ethical conflict during that year (Akst, 2015), and as they continued doing Gain-of-Function research non-stop in Wuhan at UNC.

The experiment they carried out was to develop a super-coronavirus that was capable of killing elderly mice, a result that they do not present, as it would be expected, in the main text, but rather in a compound figure in their supplement (Fig. 3b), in which the complete death of elderly mice is observed on the fourth day (Menachery et al., 2015). In a recent interview with Baric, it was indicated that this murderous virus was “found”, but the truth is that he, with Zheng-Li and one peer, plus his team, “designed” it, but did not “find” it as it was deceivingly reported on 2020: (whose headline has been saved at But, just from the onset, you can start seeing that there is the desire by the seriously conflicted actors, for all of this to remain hidden or changed.

Remarkable in this Menachery et al. (2015) work is that two of the authors came from Wuhan, where the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, and that they are credited with having brought both the necessary plasmids, as well as the murderous version of the modified gene “Spike”, a key protein for viral entry into the human cells, and that Baric just now deposited its sequence MT308984:

Now, it has been discovered that a handwritten version exists before the final version of this 2015 article by Baric for the journal Nature Medicine (now under Chinese control), and it was the first version format to be published by the NIH PubMed; what is noticeable about this previous version, is that it has two more and key methodological references that are not present in the final electronic version (Menachery et al., 2015). Art Bobroff, through Facebook, indicates that the removal of those two key methodological references is a standard procedure in GoF research, to comply with the “law” about this kind of risky research; it may be so, but indeed those references are very telling.

The first is from 2005 and shows that the Spike protein site called the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), was also very well known, focusing since then as well, only on the six key amino-acid contacts within the so-called then RBM, Receptor Binding Motif, currently known generically as RBD mostly due to Andersen et al. (2020), whose work has been multiple times debunked, such as in Stout (2020, thanks to Rubio for the reference), which is responsible for the attachment of the virus to the receptor of the lung cells called the ACE2; in addition, since then, the state of the underground molecular art allowed already something like single nucleotide changes to be made on individual nucleotides (already known, but later made into a CRISPR/Cas9-deaminase methodology: Shevidi et al. 2017), which in turn would modify the resulting amino acid, and in such article, its authors focus on modifying the key amino acids necessary to improve the RBD binding to the ACE2 (Qu et al., 2005), and even later, to other receptors, such as CD147.

The other experimental article omitted is from 2008, and is similar to the previous one, with the difference that it already begins to outline the final optimal amino acids for the RBD of COVID-19, because it defines that an artificial substitution of a Leucine for a Phenylalanine makes the union more solid between the RBD and the hACE2 receptor, and it is precise with a Phenylalanine, as established in that article, that we finally find it, and in the same position, as relative to the RBD of COVID-19; so, as in the article it is an L472F change for the old Sars-CoV-1 (Sheahan et al., 2008), this corresponds to L486F in the case of the new Sars-CoV-2, as the COVID-19 virus is known (linking the name to China).

The importance of these findings is that it is not necessary to invoke a natural cross-linking in a fantastic animal intermediary that seems to be meant to never to be found, as to have obtained the new virus, through trial and error during all of these twenty years or so, that they were already doing tirelessly during that time, the needed work to experimentally obtain the best optimal combination in the real world as it is currently present in COVID-19 (and not necessarily a “theoretical” best).

And apart of these three basic antecedents (2005, 2008, 2015), and that’s not all, as there are more as if when penetrating the rabbit hole of Alice, but for reasons of time, I note an “opinion” piece (Andersen et al., 2020, also from China-controlled Nature, and with endless conflicts of interests, as it happens with all of those “defending” and covering-up against the right kind of research as to track its real origins), which is basically what has deliberately blinded the critical spirit of most scientists, and has been taken as “the consensus”, even though such article doesn’t even solve anything and omits many of the basic and necessary references. That article notes that the RBD of COVID-19 resembles more closely that of a pangolin virus, while the rest of the viral background is of a bat virus. It is this kind of non-granted opinion that has made “people of science” “strive for politics”, instead of looking at the evidence, because: What could have been the intermediary animal inside which the mentioned combination (of the backbone of the virus of the bat, with the precise RBD similar to that of a pangolin virus), and could that have been recombined in such a very punctual and targeted manner? So, the hypothesis without a solution that they pose of a mythological or utopian “beast”, while many lack the critical spirit to do science, consider as if it were the last word but which would require that two different viruses to exchange information in a very precise and targeted way such as that performed in a lab, in the same animal to be true: The bat virus, recombining with the pangolin virus, so that, in an extremely incredible way, exclusively inserting the optimal site of the RBD from a “pangolin”-like virus (18 nucleotides within a total of approximately 29,903 for the complete sequence of the COVID-19, or just a 0.06% of the sequence); as if the pangolin virus had become embedded in a very localized way with no trace in any other place of its genome within the framework of the bat virus. A noncritical belief is required to think in such a way, to be blindly convinced that the pangolin virus was so accurate as to transmit those 6 x 3 sites that are indeed distant or separated within the RBD region, aiming precisely at the proper targets towards the bat virus to optimize those 18 nucleotides at only their precise positions.

To end with these antecedents, I must say that this is not all, although this is what we are made to “believe” in an extremely simplistic way, by most of those who want to end this uncomfortable exploration of the true origins of the virus once and for all. Uncomfortable because legally it would involve China and so many localized factions within the USA, since the financing for the Chinese in Wuhan to continue working with these viruses come in part and during several deliveries, from the North American NIH (Mulraney & Owen, 2020), which sent 3.7 x 2 millions of dollars to Wuhan and more (Morrell, 2020), but this amount pales in comparison to what Gates delivered to “buy” the WHO in 2010 to establish “the decade of the vaccines” or a “Digital” “vaccination,” as he has called it, consisting of 10 billion dollars (Gates Foundation, 2010), being today Gates to the sole biggest financier of the WHO once Trump decided to stop funding it. However, during that time of the year that COVID-19 was released (September 2019), the bats were asleep, hibernating, and no bats are sold in that, blamed first by the CCP with no previous investigation, and now destroyed, Wuhan wet-market and the first three infected with COVID-19 had no contact with that market (Sirotkin & Sirotkin, 2020), plus there has been no transparency at all in any kind of delivery of results. This is now old news because, at this point, even the Chinese CCP acknowledges that there is no evidence that such market did anything at all to modify those sequences, making them lethal to old and sick humans, as the excellent review appeared at the “Bulleting of Atomic Scientists” has just informed us (Leitenberg, 2020). But, I leave it in your hands to explore all of that (if you can find it now that Google is modifying its algorithms to make sure the results of the thousands of serious researchers exploring the lab origin of COVID-19 are harder and harder to find, coupled this to the deletion of all sorts of evidence by China, from notebooks to databases, from actual samples to blocking and international inquiry team other than the WHO). However, since this work is rather molecular, I will be mostly focused on it.

[1] Previously: Molecular Postdoctoral at the Baylor College of Medicine and at the New York Medical College;,,, (v.1 Self-Published in Spanish: Yola, 05/08/2020). The full number is:,  and the final published reference of this article (which has also been submitted to the PubMed of the NIH) is:

Fresh Sequences out of the Lab from Dr. Chavez. They are Sleuthing out the Source of this Artificial BioWeapon

Remember what ONE Tzolkin Harmonic Looks like? FOUR SQUARES = 4 DAYS or 4 KIN in the Harmonic code. There are 64, 4 kin Harmonics adding up to 260 days. In each KIN (a square) are 5 archetypes that I believe are actually tRNA molecules that CODE ALL AMINO ACIDS IN OUR LOCAL UNIVERSE. This is the Code of Life and I’m cracking it…I think. It needs to be run in the lab.

For instance, In harmonic 1, the very top left is Red 1 Dragon. Red 1 Dragon is 1 Cysteine in the nucleus of the tRNA molecule, 1 Tyrosine in on the right analog, 1 Cysteine is above as the Guide Power, 1 Asparigine is the anticodon and the Tzolkin Antipode and 13 Stop Codon is the Hidden Wisdom. If you go to HF 65, the INVERSE HARMONIC of HF1 you will find the binary triplet configuration pulsing EXACTLY off of that molecular line-up in HF1 on every single kin, on theme, hidden wisdom, and analog.

Here are the sequences of Covid19

As of TODAY from the lab, Imagine every 3 letters to represent 1 Tzolkin Harmonic which as we know, has 4 kin composed of 5 archetypes in it. I’ve got the DNA worked out according to the Tzolkin Code but I don’t have it in a database so I’m doing it by sight. The hope is that the inverse harmonics, which I’ve found balance the tRNA in each kin, will help them find a medicine that can at least shore up our strong, natural immunity. This thing is an artificial bio-weapon so a natural cure will only work part of the way. Honestly, the reason this thing HAS NOT turned into a full-blown pandemic is because of the social distancing. The masks are useless. Why did they release a bioweapon? These protein signatures can provide clues.

I’ll be honest, Dr. Chavez has me alarmed as I read his response to all of this. If you look at the numbers on a planet of 8 billion people, by no means is this a pandemic at this point, thus the protest. But they are concerned it could become one so maybe that’s why they’re calling it that.

Also, HCQ should be on hand everywhere as well as the anti-viral Chinese herbs. I have them in my office and took them when I had it. They work!!

The main analyzed regions

Region « A », Location of the 600 bases from the COVID_19 reference genome “Wuhan market” ID: LR757998.1.Its length was between 21072 and 21672 nucleotides.


See details alignment in supplementary materials « a ».Region «B», Location of the 330 first bases from the COVID_19 reference genome “Wuhan market”ID: LR757998.1.Their length was between 21672 and 22002 nucleotides (then immediately following region «A»:COVID-19, SARS and Bats Coronaviruses Genomes Peculiar Homologous RNA SequencesInternational Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH 220


See details alignment in supplementary materials « b ».We analyzed this larger region which starts at the same address as our region “B”: entitled « Region Lyons-Weiler » [4]. Their length was between 21672 and 23050 (1378 nucleotides) within the reference genome Wuhan market: LR757998.1In the RESULTS and DISCUSSION, we will more particularly analyze a small region of 225 nucleotides of the reference genome:


%d bloggers like this: