A Prophetic Dream I had in December 2020

Someone tell me it isn’t so. I don’t like it when I see things far ahead of time such as this.

Someone saw this post of mine from 2.5 years ago. (see link below) I forgot about it. In it, I said I had a dream about babies children, and vaccines and didn’t want to talk about it. Now, recently in 2022, they are talking about vaccinating babies with the toxic mRNA vaccine and crowing 🐓 about it. I dreamt it on my birth gateway…of course BEFORE THERE WAS A VACCINE!. God help us.

Sometimes I want to crawl into a hole.

https://wp.me/p35dLy-3Mh

Documents Reveal Hundreds of Media Companies Including Conservative Media were Paid by Federal Government to Promote the COVID-19 Vaccines

By Jim Hoft
Published March 7, 2022, at 7:15am

Here is the link :https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/documents-reveal-hundreds-media-companies-including-conservative-media-paid-federal-government-promote-covid-19-vaccines/

ShareTweetShare to GabTelegramShare

New documents obtained by The Blaze Media through FOIA request revealed that HHS paid major media organizations including cable TV news stations, publications, digital media companies, and many more to promote the Covid-19 vaccine narrative as part of a “comprehensive media campaign.

Jim Hoft, author of this article

HHS did not disclose how much money the agency had spent on each media platform to push their narrative and spin positive stories about the experimental vaccines.

According to Emerald Robinson, this is the largest and most comprehensive breach of journalistic ethics in history.

“That is the largest and most comprehensive breach of journalistic ethics that has ever occurred. Almost everybody took the money. Almost everybody lied about the vaccines (knowingly or unknowingly). Almost everybody refused to report anything negative about the vaccines — because they were paid to close their eyes. Almost everybody is implicated,” Robinson wrote.

TRENDING: “Should Be Ashamed of Themselves” – Arizona Republicans Get Caught – Rebuke Trump and Change Rules on Precinct Committeemen (VIDEO)

Blaze Media reported:

HHS revealed that it purchased advertising from major news networks including ABC, CBS, and NBC, as well as cable TV news stations Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, legacy media publications including the New York Post, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post, digital media companies like BuzzFeed News and Newsmax, and hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations. These outlets were collectively responsible for publishing countless articles and video segments regarding the vaccine that were nearly uniformly positive about the vaccine in terms of both its efficacy and safety.

Hundreds of news organizations were paid by the federal government to advertise for the vaccines as part of a “comprehensive media campaign,” according to documents TheBlaze obtained from the Department of Health and Human Services. The Biden administration purchased ads on TV, radio, in print, and on social media to build vaccine confidence, timing this effort with the increasing availability of the vaccines. The government also relied on earned media featuring “influencers” from “communities hit hard by COVID-19” and “experts” like White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci and other academics to be interviewed and promote vaccination in the news.

The Biden administration engaged in a massive campaign to educate the public and promote vaccination as the best way to prevent serious illness or death from COVID-19.

Congress appropriated $1 billion in fiscal year 2021 for the secretary of health to spend on activities to “strengthen vaccine confidence in the United States.” Federal law authorizes HHS to act through the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other agencies to award contracts to public and private entities to “carry out a national, evidence-based campaign to increase awareness and knowledge of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for the prevention and control of diseases, combat misinformation about vaccines, and disseminate scientific and evidence-based vaccine-related information, with the goal of increasing rates of vaccination across all ages … to reduce and eliminate vaccine-preventable diseases.”

Read more here.

On Joe Biden’s Gateway, on the Karmic Strand, We Have This. Synchronicity.

Joe Biden is White 2 World-Bridger and TODAY is White 2 World-Bridger. The hologram is very much spot on and completely…out of their control.🥳

DECEMBER 13, 2021-3 MINUTE READ

OCTOBER 13, 2016: Vice President Joe Biden campaigns for Nevada Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Catherine Cortez Masto and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at the Culinary Union, Las Vegas, NV
BY ARJUN WALIA
  • DECEMBER 13, 2021-3 MINUTE READ
  • NEWS

Federal Judge Blocks Biden COVID Vaccine Mandate For Healthcare Workers

IN BRIEF

  • The Facts:Some of the largest U.S. hospital systems have dropped Covid-19 vaccine mandates for staff after a federal judge temporarily halted a Biden administration mandate that healthcare workers get the shots.
  • Reflect On:Why has the science that calls into question vaccine mandates been completely ignored? Why has the mainstream failed to have appropriate discussions around science and evidence that raises legitimate concerns about COVID vaccines?

Pause – set your Pulse…

Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Vaccine mandates around the world have been met with fierce opposition, but the mandates continue to intensify. Austria recently announced that vaccines will be required for every single citizen starting on the first of February.

In the United States, vaccines have been mandated for all federal employees, federal contractors, and healthcare workers – but there’s been a harsh resistance to these mandates. The latest example comes from Ohio, as well as 10 other states in the US where the mandate has been temporarily blocked.

–> Last day to get 45% off: Keep your energy and immune system strong with high quality Vitamin C & Vitamin D supplements. Click here to learn more.

The Biden administration is currently in the process of appealing.

For example, The Cleveland Clinic, University Hospitals and Aultman Hospitals are pausing their requirements for employees to be vaccinated against COVID. These decisions were made after a federal judge temporarily blocked President Biden’s mandate for healthcare workers from going into effect in Ohio.

Furthermore according to Fortune,

At least four states, Florida, Iowa, Kansas and Tennessee, have recently passed laws to allow employees to sign up for unemployment insurance if they are fired for their refusal to comply with vaccine mandates. A number of state lawmakers in Arkansas, New York, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin have introduced legislation to do the same, and legal scholars expect more to come in 2022. 

Biden had imposed a Dec. 6, 2021 deadline for health care workers to get the first dose of the vaccine and a Jan. 4, 2022 deadline to be fully vaccinated. 

U.S. District Court Judge Terry A. Doughty said the federal executive branch does not have the constitutional authority to implement the vaccine requirement. 

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has challenged and sued over other aspects of Biden’s vaccine requirements, too, including a mandate that businesses with more than 100 employees must require COVID-19 vaccines. 

Some healthcare facilities are choosing to keep vaccine mandates in place. In light of the new ruling, Akron Children’s Hospital is extending its deadline for employees to be vaccinated until Jan. 11, 2022 but will not drop requirements for employees to be vaccinated.

Ontario and Quebec Canada also dropped vaccine requirements for healthcare workers due to a labour shortage, but individual hospitals still have the option of requiring their employees to get vaccinated.

Vaccine mandates have caused issues for healthcare systems around the world despite the fact that the majority of healthcare workers in various regions are fully vaccinated. For example, in November, more than 4,000 healthcare workers in British Columbia, Canada that had not received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine were placed on unpaid leave. This resulted in many surgeries being postponed.

Because of staff shortages, companies like Spectrum Health, a provider and network of hospitals and other healthcare facilities in Southwest and West Michigan, is allowing healthcare workers who have acquired natural immunity to continue to work.

In New York state there were approximately 70,000 healthcare workers that were not vaccinated, which represented 16% of the total amount of healthcare workers. All of these people were set to lose their jobs unless they agreed to get fully vaccinated.

Lewis County General Hospital in New York had to stop delivering babies in September due to a shortage of staff. At that time, approximately 26 percent of workers at that hospital were refusing to get vaccinated.

There are many examples, even early on in the pandemic many healthcare workers were quite hesitant at the thought of being forced to comply. For example, Riverside County, California has a population of approximately 2.4 million, and about 50 percent of healthcare workers in the county were refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine despite the fact that they had top priority and access to it early in the pandemic.

With mandates being put in place and people fearing job loss, many have been coerced into taking the vaccines. But the number of people and healthcare workers specifically that refuse to be jabbed is still significant enough to cause a shortage of labour in healthcare facilities across the country.

Copyright The Pulse. 2021

← Harvard Study. The Vax Does Not Stop the Spread OR Keep You From Getting Sick.

Anti-Covid19 v.2

This was originally posted August 26, 2020. Dr. Chavez told me he felt his life was threatened around this time. As of November 21, 2022 I have not heard from him. He had a stroke and asked for me help with looking up treatment which I did. I have not heard from him. It caused blindness. I am very suspicious about what caused his stroke. Dr. Chavez saw my work before I published and was complimentary but probably like many scientists, doesn’t fully understand it yet.

I’ve been in Messenger with Dr. Chavez. I needed to delete my last post by him because he feels his life is threatened. (I JUST SAW THIS! OCT. 27 2021.) There are more details I will not disclose. But I have been allowed to post portions of this paper. It’s 62 pages long and this is just the first 7 pages. Dr. Chavez is a PhD molecular biologist who has studied the CV2 sequence extensively.

I may post another section tomorrow Enjoy! Lisa

COVID-19: Hypothesis of the Lab Origin versus a Zoonotic Event Which Can Also be of a Lab Origin

By Dr,Fernando Castro-Chavez.[1]

Abstract:

To treat the cause of a disease and not only its effects are of the utmost importance; hence, we need to know the origin of this pandemic of COVID-19, to be able, if possible, to prevent an event of such a nature and magnitude in the future, and to be able to avoid all sorts of abuses to humanity, as is happening right now. Bullet points here addressed are:

1) To have, inside the backbone of a virus from a bat (mostly ~97.55% of the viral RNA (by deducting the HIV inserts found by Perez, Montagnier and others), & as per the findings of Petrovsky, see below, and also to contrast the differences), the insertion similar to that of a pangolin virus for the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD, which basically consists of six separated key amino acids, or the 0.06% of its genome for these particular 18 nucleotides), being their receptor the ACE2 of the human lung, appearing at a time (as earlier as since September of 2019), where there were already mature all of the molecular methodologies necessary to modify individual nucleotides (Crispr-Cas9, “Seamless”, etc.) that then modify at will the resulting amino acids, with the possibility to give an extra passage to the virus through ferrets (or other lab animals) that have an ACE2 very similar to the humans, to give it then a more “natural” appearance (by random trivial changes); because, had it been natural, this could had required an animal host infected with these two viruses simultaneously, and that with an unexplainable marksmanship, to specifically modify the key six codons (and a second independent of such impossible recombinants, to give raise to the differences exclusively present at the end of the long Orf1ab, into the Nsf15 and Nsf16);

2) To have an even more important and unique peculiar site, PRRAR (encompassing the needed 12 bases to complete that sequence, being this the 0.04% of the full genome), for protease cleavage (new to Plasmin and Furin, plus Trypsin, TMRPSS2, etc.) inside the protein called Spike (S), to obtain the fragments S1 and S2 to allow the viral RNA to penetrate the cell (expanding the range, not only to lung cells as the previous modification but also to white and neural cells), whose nucleotides producing it are highly strange to the rest of the viral sequence, because they contain more than an 83% of richness in its nucleotides GC, being these 12 nucleotides alien to the rest of the virus: CCUCGGCGGGCA (similar to bacterial and to methodological sequences patented by Moderna, Inc., cleavable by restriction enzymes BsaJI, AciI, Cac8I, MnlI…), that are engrained to the three remaining bases: CGU present in the frame of the bat virus to complete the necessary sequence. This will require, either a third virus completely unknown until now, either in the same utopian animal described before, or through a second passage of the first chimera into another animal, and then that such viral beast, could also be able to target exclusively this region, and no other site whatsoever; then, it is explored,

3) The biggest shot in variation, when it is compared to the first sequence obtained of the virus of COVID-19, with its immediate ancestor, that according to Shi Zheng-Li is the RaTG13 (submitted a posteriori of the COVID-19 first sequence, and which researchers demonstrate that this is a partially made-up sequence (see below), having her deliberately ignored even to cite her previous identical reference called BtCoV/4991 (2016), or even her most recent reference of the same that she put under the name of SARSr-CoV Ra4991 (2019), being very dishonest for her to change in at least three identified times the names of her same sequence, actions that render her highly suspicious, because she hid the rest of the sequence at least during the last four year (having been obtained from excrement in a cave, she says. After a call due to a serious case of miners infected at Yunnan. Nobody knows what was inside at least six miners), but her publishing it until now, after the emergence of a similar virus, makes her highly suspicious, rather than making her look innocent. Who can say that she did not manipulate as well artificially such sequence, or that the CCP Chinese military did not do the same to the other two previous sequences that are also somehow similar to Sars-CoV-2?

How many more hundreds of sequences will they be hiding? Nobody independently has been able to verify the accuracy of their claims. Everything is based only on what they say. Given that the nucleotides of six proteins exhibit a 99% of similitude between both sequences, while twelve of them go down to a 96% or even are below of this number, being the most extreme changes, the ones that are inside the sequence for the protein Spike, which while exhibiting a global similitude of 93%, is the one having the highest discrepancy between the two sequences.

Within this same one there are extreme shorter variations, with a low similitude of 44% on that specific of the RBD mentioned before, which goes down to some 17% for the region of those 18 key bases. Only 20% percent for that sequence of 12 bases for the resulting protease cleavage site; other changes include the optimal nucleotides of an even shorter region of 16 segments similar to immunodeficiency genes (plus two more distant ones). Even a couple of concatenated Plasmodium yoelii found by Perez and Montagnier at the S2 place, all that could be better explained with artificial processes already in place to do this and more within the frame of the awful Gain-of-Function sinister and dual-purpose (or double-talk) research.

So, it is their word against the world, and that is why since at least 2010 I have been proposing an independent verification by at least three other labs of results reported, especially by CCP Chinese researchers, as they did cost me already my first job in the US by their lying during at least ten years about a methodological artifact that I called “Palindromati”, and that they kept on reporting as “natural” while receiving grants to explore a chimera.

How much more is it costing their apparent lying about the artificial origin of COVID-19 at this time?) So, all of these points and so much more, because Jesse Morrell, for example, is reaching a set of almost 40 (and counting) pieces of evidence of a lab origin versus cero. Otherwise, things and persons that are leading us to conclude that it is evident to see that there was human intervention in the emergence of this Sars-CoV-2 virus because in 2015-2018 there was not in existence any zoonotic history of any class in Wuhan, so, this virus, having been originated already mature and fully capable to attack the human population, implies an artificial “injecting” source.

“…have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of DARKNESS, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by THEM in secret. But all things that are exposed are made manifest by the LIGHT…” An inspired Paul in Eph. 5:11-13.

Dedicated to Francis S. Collins for the many to be able to see…

Introduction:

A balanced set of voices is needed in this COVID-19 Pandemic, and such is the purpose of this work, to speak the pros and the cons of every claim. I also want to make this presentation a personal one, as scientists tend to simulate isolation of themselves from their research. But in the end, they are still as human as anybody else and their personal bias and experiences always show up.

So, here we will be just another lonely human. Especially within this Pandemic that has tended to “dehumanize” humanity. So, here I am, back to the simplicity of what is meant to be “human” and with feelings.

Three pieces of evidence in science are normally required to establish something as evident (Crombie, 1994). In this case, we will see three minimum reasons, and one more to give a certain range of tolerance (plus another at the beginning, aimed at those with eyes to see), and this will be the determining factor in identifying if COVID-19 is artificial or otherwise, which will show prominently to the reader that this COVID-19 virus is of a human design. Currently, there are zero shreds of evidence in favor of the opposite view.

I hope that other scientists, especially all those honest virologists, immunologists, immunologists, epidemiologists, molecular biologists, human physicians (excluding those “inhumane”), veterinarians, etc., etc., are also doing this kind of vital work, as it is to “define the origin” of this COVID-19 pandemic, which is mainly devastating morally the people of this planet (humans against humans), and needless to say, devastating the infected victims (from all of those tainted statistics that we are all aware of).

It is necessary to know the truth to prevent something like this from happening again, and to prevent a recurrence in the course of the current pandemic, as there is still the slightest chance that more of the same pathogens will continue to be released with the purpose of “escalating” such crisis, which by all accounts has been designed globally, but with the final target of the USA. The fact that an official denial appears in all articles related to the human engineering of COVID-19, saying that: “There is no evidence of it”, indeed speaks volumes about a deliberate attempt to silence the truth, as well as does the unrequested invasion of our privacy by the WHO in all social platform available on the internet, and the censorship by the same WHO under higher orders, of every posting or video that does not agree with the narrative that they pretend to impose over the whole of the human race.

Here, I present then, this minimal evidence that shows just the opposite: That “there is evidence” indeed of a lab-leak, and even further, of an even engineered virus as the most plausible explanation of the current malady, as if planned. This is presented for the free evaluation of the reader.

This work is also an attempt to respond to the most recent question posed in Nature, talking about the WIV of Zheng-Li Shi: “The lab does hold coronaviruses related to SARS-CoV-2, so it is possible that one could have escaped, perhaps if a lab worker accidentally became infected from a virus sample or animal in the facility and then passed it on to someone outside the facility. It is also theoretically possible that scientists at the lab tweaked the virus’s genome for research purposes before it escaped, but, again, there is no evidence that they did. Shi declined to respond to Nature’s questions about her experiments, saying that she has been inundated with media requests” (Cyranoski. 2020) So, Shi, the main suspect in this story is declining to explain her research, however, in what she has published thus far there is vast evidence that COVID-19 may have been designed there at the WIV, the evidence available for anybody willing to dig into her publications. This article wishes to help a little on that aspect.

Antecedents:

Most recently, before the release of his second article on the subject, Birger Sørensen declared: “I think it’s more than 90 percent certain. It’s at least a far more probable explanation than it having developed this way in nature” (https://archive.vn/Wmj9p), where he also explains that the adulterations go beyond the attachment to the human ACE2 receptor (shown in my first point) and, it is within that spirit that I present my current work. So, I name this study “Anticovidian v.2” because it is in line with my previous collective research into Antiobesity (Castro-Chavez et al., 2003) and Antiatherosclerosis (Castro-Chavez et al., 2013), where I also demonstrated, as I hope to do here, that a contaminating laboratory artifact had intruded on thousands of sequences present in the Genbank and even in the Affimetrix Microarrays (Castro-Chavez, 2012). In this viral case, a most basic antecedent I would like to emphasize as many have done, and this is the article by Baric & Zhengli (Zheng-Li) from 2015 (Menachery et al., 2015), published within the time in which Obama had advised a moratorium for such studies, moratorium which lasted in the US from 2014 to 2017, and in the end, it was when, Obama before leaving office indicated its reactivation until the ban was finally lifted by Francis S. Collins (Morrell, 2020). However, in disregard of that ban, these authors managed to continuously publish their work, which again aroused an ethical conflict during that year (Akst, 2015), and as they continued doing Gain-of-Function research non-stop in Wuhan at UNC.

The experiment they carried out was to develop a super-coronavirus that was capable of killing elderly mice, a result that they do not present, as it would be expected, in the main text, but rather in a compound figure in their supplement (Fig. 3b), in which the complete death of elderly mice is observed on the fourth day (Menachery et al., 2015). In a recent interview with Baric, it was indicated that this murderous virus was “found”, but the truth is that he, with Zheng-Li and one peer, plus his team, “designed” it, but did not “find” it as it was deceivingly reported on 2020: https://www.wral.com/unc-researcher-found-deadly-virus-in-bats-in-china-in-2015/18913313/ (whose headline has been saved at https://archive.vn/DI2mT). But, just from the onset, you can start seeing that there is the desire by the seriously conflicted actors, for all of this to remain hidden or changed.

Remarkable in this Menachery et al. (2015) work is that two of the authors came from Wuhan, where the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, and that they are credited with having brought both the necessary plasmids, as well as the murderous version of the modified gene “Spike”, a key protein for viral entry into the human cells, and that Baric just now deposited its sequence MT308984: https://archive.vn/P5ay7

Now, it has been discovered that a handwritten version exists before the final version of this 2015 article by Baric for the journal Nature Medicine (now under Chinese control), and it was the first version format to be published by the NIH PubMed; what is noticeable about this previous version, is that it has two more and key methodological references that are not present in the final electronic version (Menachery et al., 2015). Art Bobroff, through Facebook, indicates that the removal of those two key methodological references is a standard procedure in GoF research, to comply with the “law” about this kind of risky research; it may be so, but indeed those references are very telling.

The first is from 2005 and shows that the Spike protein site called the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), was also very well known, focusing since then as well, only on the six key amino-acid contacts within the so-called then RBM, Receptor Binding Motif, currently known generically as RBD mostly due to Andersen et al. (2020), whose work has been multiple times debunked, such as in Stout (2020, thanks to Rubio for the reference), which is responsible for the attachment of the virus to the receptor of the lung cells called the ACE2; in addition, since then, the state of the underground molecular art allowed already something like single nucleotide changes to be made on individual nucleotides (already known, but later made into a CRISPR/Cas9-deaminase methodology: Shevidi et al. 2017), which in turn would modify the resulting amino acid, and in such article, its authors focus on modifying the key amino acids necessary to improve the RBD binding to the ACE2 (Qu et al., 2005), and even later, to other receptors, such as CD147.

The other experimental article omitted is from 2008, and is similar to the previous one, with the difference that it already begins to outline the final optimal amino acids for the RBD of COVID-19, because it defines that an artificial substitution of a Leucine for a Phenylalanine makes the union more solid between the RBD and the hACE2 receptor, and it is precise with a Phenylalanine, as established in that article, that we finally find it, and in the same position, as relative to the RBD of COVID-19; so, as in the article it is an L472F change for the old Sars-CoV-1 (Sheahan et al., 2008), this corresponds to L486F in the case of the new Sars-CoV-2, as the COVID-19 virus is known (linking the name to China).

The importance of these findings is that it is not necessary to invoke a natural cross-linking in a fantastic animal intermediary that seems to be meant to never to be found, as to have obtained the new virus, through trial and error during all of these twenty years or so, that they were already doing tirelessly during that time, the needed work to experimentally obtain the best optimal combination in the real world as it is currently present in COVID-19 (and not necessarily a “theoretical” best).

And apart of these three basic antecedents (2005, 2008, 2015), and that’s not all, as there are more as if when penetrating the rabbit hole of Alice, but for reasons of time, I note an “opinion” piece (Andersen et al., 2020, also from China-controlled Nature, and with endless conflicts of interests, as it happens with all of those “defending” and covering-up against the right kind of research as to track its real origins), which is basically what has deliberately blinded the critical spirit of most scientists, and has been taken as “the consensus”, even though such article doesn’t even solve anything and omits many of the basic and necessary references. That article notes that the RBD of COVID-19 resembles more closely that of a pangolin virus, while the rest of the viral background is of a bat virus. It is this kind of non-granted opinion that has made “people of science” “strive for politics”, instead of looking at the evidence, because: What could have been the intermediary animal inside which the mentioned combination (of the backbone of the virus of the bat, with the precise RBD similar to that of a pangolin virus), and could that have been recombined in such a very punctual and targeted manner? So, the hypothesis without a solution that they pose of a mythological or utopian “beast”, while many lack the critical spirit to do science, consider as if it were the last word but which would require that two different viruses to exchange information in a very precise and targeted way such as that performed in a lab, in the same animal to be true: The bat virus, recombining with the pangolin virus, so that, in an extremely incredible way, exclusively inserting the optimal site of the RBD from a “pangolin”-like virus (18 nucleotides within a total of approximately 29,903 for the complete sequence of the COVID-19, or just a 0.06% of the sequence); as if the pangolin virus had become embedded in a very localized way with no trace in any other place of its genome within the framework of the bat virus. A noncritical belief is required to think in such a way, to be blindly convinced that the pangolin virus was so accurate as to transmit those 6 x 3 sites that are indeed distant or separated within the RBD region, aiming precisely at the proper targets towards the bat virus to optimize those 18 nucleotides at only their precise positions.

To end with these antecedents, I must say that this is not all, although this is what we are made to “believe” in an extremely simplistic way, by most of those who want to end this uncomfortable exploration of the true origins of the virus once and for all. Uncomfortable because legally it would involve China and so many localized factions within the USA, since the financing for the Chinese in Wuhan to continue working with these viruses come in part and during several deliveries, from the North American NIH (Mulraney & Owen, 2020), which sent 3.7 x 2 millions of dollars to Wuhan and more (Morrell, 2020), but this amount pales in comparison to what Gates delivered to “buy” the WHO in 2010 to establish “the decade of the vaccines” or a “Digital” “vaccination,” as he has called it, consisting of 10 billion dollars (Gates Foundation, 2010), being today Gates to the sole biggest financier of the WHO once Trump decided to stop funding it. However, during that time of the year that COVID-19 was released (September 2019), the bats were asleep, hibernating, and no bats are sold in that, blamed first by the CCP with no previous investigation, and now destroyed, Wuhan wet-market and the first three infected with COVID-19 had no contact with that market (Sirotkin & Sirotkin, 2020), plus there has been no transparency at all in any kind of delivery of results. This is now old news because, at this point, even the Chinese CCP acknowledges that there is no evidence that such market did anything at all to modify those sequences, making them lethal to old and sick humans, as the excellent review appeared at the “Bulleting of Atomic Scientists” has just informed us (Leitenberg, 2020). But, I leave it in your hands to explore all of that (if you can find it now that Google is modifying its algorithms to make sure the results of the thousands of serious researchers exploring the lab origin of COVID-19 are harder and harder to find, coupled this to the deletion of all sorts of evidence by China, from notebooks to databases, from actual samples to blocking and international inquiry team other than the WHO). However, since this work is rather molecular, I will be mostly focused on it.


[1] Previously: Molecular Postdoctoral at the Baylor College of Medicine and at the New York Medical College; fdocc@yahoo.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9661-5672, https://bcm.academia.edu/fernandocastrochavez, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fernando_Castro-Chavez (v.1 Self-Published in Spanish: Yola, 05/08/2020). The full number is: https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume20/E-Journal_GJSFR_%28I%29_Vol_20_Issue_3.pdf,  and the final published reference of this article (which has also been submitted to the PubMed of the NIH) is: https://web.archive.org/web/20200811115437/https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume20/2-Anticovidian-v-2-COVID-19.pdf

No RNA Vaccine Passports

“Vaccinated individuals were 27 times more likely to get a symptomatic COVID infection than those with natural immunity from COVID. “

Said millions of Holistic practitioners and intelligent doctors all over the world in MARCH 2020!

Readers of this blog know that the 3 different main forms of RNA are continually mutating, probably about every three months. DNA is the only rigid gene in the nucleus.

There is NO WAY a manmade vaccine can protect you from a newly mutating cold virus more than your own immune system shored up by supplements like Ashwaganda, Sun Ten Immune Support, or Astragalus root and a happy attitude. Piles of studies folks and my own body improvement over 20 years and my work prove it.

https://fee-org.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/fee.org/articles/harvard-epidemiologist-says-the-case-for-covid-vaccine-passports-was-just-demolished/amp

Photo by Thérèse Soukar, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0&gt;, via Wikimedia Commons

PoliticsVaccine PassportVaccinesNatural ImmunityCOVID-19Freedom of MovementCDCIsrael

Harvard Epidemiologist Says the Case for COVID Vaccine Passports Was Just Demolished

New research found that natural immunity offers exponentially more protection than COVID-19 vaccines.

Jon Miltimore

by  Jon Miltimore

Anewly published medical study found that infection from COVID-19 confers considerably longer-lasting and stronger protection against the Delta variant of the virus than vaccines.

“The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a ‘Don’t try this at home’ label,” the Scientific American reported Thursday. “The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.”

Put another way, vaccinated individuals were 27 times more likely to get a symptomatic COVID infection than those with natural immunity from COVID.

A Death Blow to Vaccine Passports?

The findings come as many governments around the world are demanding citizens acquire “vaccine passports” to travel. New York CityFrance, and the Canadian provinces of Quebec and British Columbia are among those who have recently embraced vaccine passports.

Meanwhile, Australia has floated the idea of making higher vaccination rates a condition of lifting its lockdown in jurisdictions, while President Joe Biden is considering making interstate travel unlawful for people who have not been vaccinated for COVID-19.

Vaccine passports are morally dubious for many reasons, not the least of which is that freedom of movement is a basic human right. However, vaccine passports become even more senseless in light of the new findings out of Israel and revelations from the CDC, some say.

Harvard Medical School professor Martin Kulldorff said research showing that natural immunity offers exponentially more protection than vaccines means vaccine passports are both unscientific and discriminatory, since they disproportionately affect working class individuals.

“Prior COVID disease (many working class) provides better immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical,” Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist, observed on Twitter.

Nor is the study out of Israel a one-off. Media reports show that no fewer than 15 academic studies have found that natural immunity offers more protection from COVID-19 than the virus.

Moreover, CDC research shows that vaccinated individuals still get infected with COVID-19 and carry just as much of the virus in their throat and nasal passage as unvaccinated individuals

“High viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission and raised concern that, unlike with other variants, vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus,” CDC Rochelle Director Walensky noted following a Cape Cod outbreak that included mostly vaccinated individuals.

These data suggest that vaccinated individuals are still spreading the virus much like unvaccinated individuals.

The Bottom Line

Vaccine passports would be immoral and a massive government overreach even in the absence of these findings. There is simply no historical parallel for governments attempting to restrict the movements of healthy people over a respiratory virus in this manner.

Yet the justification for vaccine passports becomes not just wrong but absurd in light of these new revelations.

People who have had COVID already have significantly more protection from the virus than people who’ve been vaccinated. Meanwhile, people who’ve not had COVID and choose to not get vaccinated may or may not be making an unwise decision. But if they are, they are principally putting only themselves at risk.

How COVID-19 Mutates and Affects Vaccines. They’re using the mRNA because the DNA nucleotide sequence is in it. They can Add Whatever they Want and Not Tell Us.

This is medicine. This is power. You can change and heal yourself.

Before you read the article I’m going to add my piece to it.

They say here that they’re only putting virus DNA into the mRNA template but they CAN add Human DNA into the vaccine as well to mutate us to fit their agenda if they wish. Of course they are denying it. Why would they tell us they’ve been adjusting our DNA all this time through pharma and vaccines to make us more compliant?

The virus alone entering us is safe, the natural way. The human manufactured DNA mutating vaccine is NOT safe because their agenda is not in human’s beings interest and they are capable of adding mutated DNA through the mRNA into it. They keep portraying themselves as altruistic and their track record is the opposite. This is not the time for people to believe what they want to believe to feel comfy. This is the time to use your intuition and observe synchronicity.

Here’s the nutshell (from Lisa); the mRNA (messenger RNA) template is coded by the 3 letter DNA nucleotide, then it goes through transcription and translation into the rRNA which is ribosomal RNA, the sugar backbones of the two DNA strands. The genetic code from the nucleotide is read in the rRNA transcription BEFORE it’s sent to the mysterious, uncontrollable tRNA or transfer RNA created by our ancestors to be CODED BY US, our choices, our feelings, our thoughts and 20% from our parents.

The scientists don’t understand how it works and they can’t control it like can the rigid DNA but the tRNA surrounds the mRNA anyway. That’s why they don’t know what’s going to happen! It’s up to us as a collective to control our tRNA which is done through SYNCHRONCITY with the Tzolkin and our awareness of it.

In my circle of Full Disclosure, I.E.’s and experiencers of off-world species and their planets, it is well known that Earth is a genetic experimental planet. The Urantia Book calls us a decimal planet or experimental station. None of this is sinister from our stellar ancestors perspective but when bad species made contracts with certain humans like the Nazis and royal elite who thought they were special, it did turn sinister. That is where we find ourselves now. They control the sciences and the sick care system.

It is also well known that viruses affect our evolution and always have ever since life was brought here to evolve on Earth. All life is full of mutating and evolving bacteria and viruses and humans are just part of the chain of adapting to that and we’ve done so successfully. The doctors know that and they’ve been muted, ignored or punished for pointing it out. Killing humans (war), nuclear bombing bacteria and viruses with synthetic meds and shots that are meant to help us get stronger and evolve forward is sabotage of friendly stellar ancestors help.

But humans are different in our sentience and held in very high regard by our stellar ancestors. Those making the vaccine and practicing in sick care are not on this side of the information. They view or are programmed to view humans as very deficient and weak and needing invasive intervention. In NO WAY do they acknowledge our potential and our innate super power of Mind, Body and Heart which frankly, J.C. taught and embodied. The elite far, far above them know of our potential and want to check mate it so we can be dumb enough to continue to be their slaves. The institutions that work for the elite are ignorant of the fact that they are not helping but are programmed to disempower not empower the human species.

mRNA is highlighted in this article. It is messenger RNA and has a fairly minor role to play in the mutation of RNA. tRNA or transfer RNA is the adapter between the DNA message and protein. It codes the mRNA from the ribosome. The mRNA finds the start codon on the anti-codon arm which is the Tzolkin antipode, and seeks to mutate the tRNA, which is The 5-amino-acidTzolkin Theme-plex, through Methionine (Red Moon) or UAC nucleotide. It then moves to the T-Arm or the Hidden Wisdom position. There is far, far more to this and it’s in my book. I’m still formatting the electromagnetic charges, + and -, proton and electron per the Tzolkin Harmonic. It’s not difficult, I just have to create the table.

The scientists have no clue about how our protein folds according to our ancient ancestors oracles. None. I’m not sure they’ll even understand my book, which is almost finished. They can’t conceive of the multidimensional nature of our cells. That’s dangerous when you’re messing with mRNA and putting it in an RNA vaccine!! Do they know what they’re doing or are they programmed or contracted with the bad E.T.’s to program it a certain way?

CV2 has been engineered ON PURPOSE by our good stellar ancestors and probably pretty easily given to the humans to disseminate. It’s not an accident. Our elite and our government work with some bad E.T. underground to genetically engineer us and they’ve been doing it forever. That should be part of FULL DISCLOSURE. This particular virus opens and clears out the pineal gland if the host will let it ride. If they don’t, it goes into the lungs and becomes much worse. I meditated on mine to stay in my head and not go into my lungs. I had an intuition it was supposed to and my Spirit Helpers were with me. It was all very odd but I got through it.

We have HELP evolving through meditation, the Earth, and THE SUN. We can deal with and change our own DNA via all of that. I did! It was awesome and I’m grateful. If you’re going to be in a body on this earth you have to help your body evolve and allow it to go into ascension and change. It is not wise to resist it. Viruses are brilliant entities and are meant to help us evolve upward and our immune systems are brilliant at dealing with them. No one except holistic folks and teachers give that information or help. Our society has lied and coddled people so that they think they need invasive help at every turn. That’s the disempowering programming. The article starts below.


Viruses are constantly changing. Their genetic code is prone to changes called mutations that can change how a virus looks or affects its hosts.

“Words like mutation make people think that something terribly wrong is occurring or something is dramatically different,” said Douglas Kasper, MD. Dr. Kasper is the section head of infectious disease at the University of Illinois College of Medicine Peoria and a leader in the OSF HealthCare response to COVID-19.

But often that’s not the case. Viral mutations typically have no significant immediate effect on the ability of the virus to cause disease in humans.

Dr. Kasper explains how viruses mutate and what we know about the new COVID-19 strain first detected in the United Kingdom, South Africa, Brazil and other strains.

How viruses mutate

versions of a coronavirus
abstract technology science concept DNA binary on hi tech blue background

Viruses rely on a host to survive and replicate. They invade the body of a human or an animal and bind with the host’s cells to allow their own genetic material (RNA) to enter the cells. The host’s own cells read the genetic code and replicate it, making more of the virus. That new virus then leaves the cell in search of another host to infect.

Sometimes when that genetic code is being translated into proteins, a piece of the code gets changed. This is called a mutation, and they happen frequently.

“Human cells are DNA-based. And DNA – thankfully for us – has much better integrity than RNA. (THIS IS NOT TRUE. Our RNA is the Fire behind our evolution and has the multidimensional connection that they cannot control. It’s very mutable and jelly like. DNA is rigid, ya know, for the male scientists to play with and do they ever play with it. Yet it’s only 2% of of genome. Our evolving RNA is our superpower and they’re trying to mess with it. The daily changes read through the Tzolkin are all RNA amino acids so you know how we and our relationships change. That eventually changes our DNA)

DNA has the ability to check itself. If there are small changes, or what we call mutations, to its genetic code, it can fix itself and get back to normal. RNA is a lot more messy,” Dr. Kasper said. (Note that word messy. It’s like a woman who has the prerogative to change her mind, like nature. They don’t like it.) (It’s not this cut and dried, at all. There is proof now that we can and do change our DNA by our choices.)

“This perpetual cycle of constant replication goes on. Each time a replication occurs, there is a small chance that code could change. (It’s SUPPOSED to) When you have this go over a huge population over time, the odds start to favor that the virus will adjust. It’s evolution on a very, very rapid level.”

So it’s not surprising that a virus like SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, would mutate. That’s something scientists and vaccine developers have expected since the beginning of the current epidemic. The question is how drastically and quickly is the virus changing?

Drift vs. shift

“Most of the time when these mutations occur, they are of no consequence, because one adjustment doesn’t change the protein configuration,” Dr. Kasper said. (Now see, this, they don’t know for sure because the protein configuration is exposed to the tRNA and they don’t understand how the tRNA moves or changes.)

These small changes are called “drift,” and usually translate into changes in a protein’s structure that allow our immune systems to continue to recognize and respond to an antigen. What’s more concerning are changes called “shift” – abrupt, major changes in the structure of a virus.

If a virus changes enough, it could be difficult to detect with existing tests, respond differently to treatments and medications or become unrecognizable to the antibodies developed after an infection or vaccination. (Their tests don’t work at all because they don’t know what they’re testing for. That was proven with this virus.)

Scientists around the world are looking closely at a multiple variants of SARS-CoV-2. In the United States, the dominant strain of SARS CoV2 is now B.117. (Adds up to 11. B is 2 + 9 = 11 or Spectral, dissolving, chaotic energy. You know what this is; 11:11)

This variant (B.117) has been found to be more transmissible, meaning infection is more likely to occur in those exposed to the strain, especially those who are unvaccinated. It is not known whether the B.117 variant leads to worse illness or clinical outcomes. Fortunately, the available vaccines provide protection from B.117, making timely vaccination even more of a priority for communities. (Unless you’ve had it and already have the antibodies. People know if they’ve had it. It’s the oddest virus you’ll ever have.)

There are additional variant strains that will be under close watch from worldwide health leaders. The key point remains ensuring that ongoing vaccination provides adequate protection from variant SARS CoV2 strains.

Effectiveness against variant strains

There is reason to believe that the vaccines that have been authorized or are being developed will be able to cover a fair amount of drift in SARS-CoV-2. Vaccine developers are well aware of the ability of viruses to change over time, and they created vaccines that would account for that. (That’s impossible. They just don’t want people to know they don’t know what they’re doing and messing with human RNA-very dangerous)

Because SARS-CoV-2 is part of a large group of coronaviruses, researchers have seen many variations of the spike proteins for which these viruses are named. When developers created vaccines against COVID-19, they tested them against many different variations of the spike protein. (But this one is brand new and different than the others. Fortunately, humans immune systems and consciousness knows how to ADAPT!!!)

Research shows the antibodies created after vaccination will recognize and respond to many variations of the spike protein. This leads experts to be fairly confident the vaccines will continue to be effective against many mutations that may arise. (I’ve heard the opposite. They think we will likely need 2 more versions of the RNA jab.) But they also prepared for how they would respond if a dramatic shift occurs. (Right. We’re supposed to have confidence in them after this debacle. The doctors sure don’t and neither do the therapists dealing with PTSD patients from lockdown which is worse for humans than a virus!!)

“There’s always been an expectation that over time, if these spike proteins do change significantly, the vaccine could be updated to address the changes and still provide the benefit to society that it’s intended to,” Dr. Kasper said.

About the vaccines

The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines both use mRNA to teach our bodies to recognize and fight off these spike proteins. (not good)

While they have multiple ingredients, mRNA vaccines have essentially two important components:

  • mRNA, or a small piece of the virus’s genetic code (the nucleotide and probably some HUMAN DNA as well to keep us docile)
  • A “vessel” of salt, fat and sugar that delivers the mRNA to our cells (the ribosome)

If this structure of the spike protein changed enough that the vaccine’s effectiveness was compromised, it’s likely only that small piece of genetic code would need to be updated – which is much simpler than developing an entirely new vaccine. (This is seriously indolent)

“Part of the reason the mRNA structure was chosen was because of its ability to address these kinds of changes. (because it’s coded by the DNA nucleotides) It was always likely that there would need to be an adjustment,” Dr. Kasper said.

The FDA says the Johnson & Johnson clinical trials showed that its vaccine provided “protection against several emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern,” including the ones from South Africa and Brazil.

For instance, the data that Johnson & Johnson submitted to the FDA showed that in South Africa, where the more contagious B.1.351 strain is dominant, the vaccine was 57% effective at preventing infection.

Johnson & Johnson also is designing software in real time to help respond to some of the new and emerging variants.

About Author: Laura Nightengale

Laura Nightengale was a writing coordinator for OSF HealthCare. 

She has a bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Kansas and worked as a reporter at a daily newspaper for five years before joining OSF HealthCare. 

When she’s not working, Laura loves to travel, read, and spend time with her family, including her sweet and ornery dog.

View all posts by Laura Nightengale

Tags: COVID-19infection preventionpopulation health carepreventive medicinevaccinationsviruses

Categories: COVID-19

%d bloggers like this: