This just popped up in XTwitter at 11:11. Luc was a very good friend of Dr. Chavez, who was my friend and knew of my work. I wasn’t as far along back then as I am now.
Notice that they are just now discovering that DNA has memory, which we know is the CA strand, civilizational advance, and that it makes sound. That is the Tones of Creation. All ancient t knowledge that gets ignored.
It’s stunning to me that molecular biologists are still struggling with the fact that all DNA emits ELM energy. I thought this was old news.
Lastly, the suggestion that biologists study physics. Is this new also?
They are behind.
This is a paper written by Ph.D. physicist Dr. Smith who worked on the Manhattan Project. He had a different perspective on the efficacious and ethical use of Intuition. I own the copyright.
I wrote the preface, history, glossary and added bios and pictures at the end. This booklet would be useful in history, science research methodology, or physics classes at the college level. You can find the paperback and ebook on Amazon for 14.99 and 4.99.
This booklet is for sale from the far right tab on my homepage.
I found this paper by Dr. Smith synchronistically, being a bit obsessed with the conviction that the scientific method was missing its other half; intuition. The physics nomenclature was not completely foreign to me given that I am an office chair (armchair) student of physics and other sciences myself. So, I did have fun with the bulk of the contents and view it as a hike up a science hill for a student. Bring your water bottle. Your gray cells will get a workout and I recommend it. It is for that reason I put key terms in bold and key ideas in italics.
Upon reading Dr. Smith’s biography in this booklet, you’ll see that he was a heavyweight in his era, 1934-1979 would be his approximate working time, but not as notable as his colleagues Van Allen and Allison. James Van Allen discovered the radiation belts around the earth.
I am grateful for having found this little piece of gold, for as much as I enjoy and respect the scientific method, I cannot relate to it nearly as much as I do intuition, dreaming, and the vast ocean of information in the unconscious mind which I have been aware of and lived in my entire life. It’s like breathing for me. My personal proclivity will be toward Axiology and the Behavioral Sciences as I move forward with my career.
All I ask from readers of this booklet and others is to keep an open mind and acknowledge that everyone has different experiences with information. We all deserve to be heard out; people who are very controlled in their thinking and people who are very intuitional in their thinking. The fact is, no one is right one-hundred percent of the time and you’d be committing hubris if you asserted it. Dr. Smith, with all of his education and experience, comes to the conclusion that intuition is far more important in the scientific method than previously noted. For that, I am very grateful.
Please note Table 1 on page twenty-six. I view the unity of these approaches as a holistic scientific method and wish for nothing less as we move forward forming our models of the universe.
Lisa K. Townsend, B.A., LMT