Watch “‘This Week You’re Going To See Something That Hasn’t Happened In Congress In More Than 7 Years'” on YouTube

The House Speaker on the changes to the Intelligence Committee. Let’s see if they get DISCLOSURE going at the federal level. Or do they love all the secrets as well?

“Top Secret UFO Projects Declassified” on Netflix

I highly recommend you watch this disclosure series. Just go to your Netflix app. This title will come up. There are about 8 episodes in the series.

I’m watching “Project Blue Book Unknown“. So far so good. Michael Salla and Nick Pope have already been on. I would say that this is some basic disclosure.

Kathleen Marden, UFO Researcher is the only woman, in any capacity, that I’ve seen so far.

A man, George Adamski met and talked with a Venusian about the imminent threat of nuclear war.

A other woman, Mary Rodwell was just on. JJ and Desiree Hurtak were also included.

MJ12 documents were leaked in 1980. 1947 document signed by Truman Confirmed the existence of MJ12. Nick Pope thinks they existed even before that. They didn’t want it to destroy The Church (aka The Time Thieves).

Dr. Greer recieved leaked documents from Project Aquarius that dated back to Roswell.

Caroline Corey gets to speak. Emery Smith was just on too in the context of abducted Travis Walton. He said the U.S. intelligence agencies didn’t want it to appear serious.

Uvonne Smith speaks. Terry Lovelace was chipped in his leg by the E.T. and became vocal in 2016.

They are admitting that the aerospace corporations control earth, not the governments. My input is that it is actually the ICC, the International Corporate Conglomerate which is not located on Earth. I’m pretty sure that some of the 320 earth corporations are in the ICC and its agenda is to force A.I. this planet. According g to Corey it’s already been decided that it’s not going to happen.

Why Do People Hate Smart Women? | Psychology Today

This article is from 2017 and some things have improved in 5 years, I think, because the new generation of kids isn’t willing to suffer inequities, especially with regard to gender. So essentially, this is for my gender and culture myopic generation, we middle-aged people. We weren’t raised properly in my opinion. It didn’t help that in the 60’s, when many of us were born, the c%^&* was assassinating as many truth-tellers, conducting an ethical, unnecessary Vietnam war and people were falling like flies dead. This was fallout from what we discovered in the 50’s that went underground which we are still trying to disclose. The current generation has no concept of any of the blood that flowed in our day and how corrupt the government became.

I’m sharing this again because it gets views every day and I want to pull some quotes from it. It’s obviously an unaddressed issue under the radar in our society in 2022.

Smart women, all over the world upset the structure of patriarchy.

The article

The system of inclusion or exclusion among the fully human is upset when someone who is not authorized to have a mind reveals one.

The article

Society generally trains girls to play lower status than boys. Smart women disrupt status transactions, and other people put them back in their place, like children who interrupt grownups. This is obvious on talk shows that have panels, where men talk and women get hands placed on their shoulders or forearms to remind them to wait until the adults have finished speaking.

The article

First, our verbal community teaches us to consider ourselves a mental creature, and then it teaches us to include others as well in that category. Not everyone is included, most especially people from different tribes and people who are to be treated as less than fully human—enemies, servants, foreigners, and (for men) women.

The article

Some groups of women (especially in some classrooms) join together around not standing out, around not making the other women feel bad. Smart women can make other women feel envious or inadequate.

The article

Lisa’s Comments on this article;

1. People are in charge of their own feelings just as they think their own thoughts. Therefore it’s impossible for another person’s actions to trump the power you have over yourself to feel and think what you want. People try but they only succeed if you let them.

2. Men act superior all the time and rarely act humble. I don’t see men acting humble. It’s socially unacceptable for them to do so. The author states that he wants to see a woman acting intelligent with delight, not superiority, in his first paragraph.

Not gonna happen. Some women, in fact most women, ARE smarter than men for a myriad of reasons and we’ve acted dumb and delightful long enough. Even the field. Intelligence expectations should not be based on gender and women are sick of faking. I am and I won’t. Thus I come across as having a superiority complex when in fact, I’m just being myself which is taboo in our culture. I don’t care…at all. I’m reasonable. My IQ is 137 which is gifted, not genius so I’m in the upper middle. Big whoop. 🤭 I’m here to help, not fatten my ego, otherwise I wouldn’t spend hours without pay for years on end on this blog.

Actually the topic of intelligence bores me. People can be plenty interesting without being super smart. Most of my patients are like that. I’m not super smart but super intuitive and I don’t hide it. That’s how I’m different.

The patriarchy is 12:60 Time is Money culture held up by The Church and The c$%^^. Once we get our minds straight about TRUE TIME, the genders will equal out as well.

I’m Updating Quite a Bit in Politics

Corey Goode and company have their ear to the ground on Intel and he keeps us up to date. No way you will ever see this info on Dem controlled and monopolized MSM. Especially now that they think they run the world and should for eternity. Not gonna happen. The earth and free human beings will have the final say in Truth.

It’s not conspiracy. It’s Earth Alliance arm of SSP, an arm of the U.S. military Air Force that Trump created to counter the B.S. Corey posts on Telegram and Sphere Being Alliance.

Please don’t forget that Trump was President of the United States for 4 years, 2016-2020 even though the media, Congress and the Democrats would like to erase THAT FACT from everyone’s mind. Maybe bc he’s not a 33rd degree Mason or part of their cult?

You might want to use the politics intuitive category on the home page. Better yet use Search because WP has censored my Artificial Intelligence and politics posts.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (which are UFO’s) June 25, 2021-UNCLASSIFIED


This preliminary report is provided by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)
in response to the provision in Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA) for the Fiscal Year 2021, that the DNI, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense
(SECDEF), is to submit an intelligence assessment of the threat posed by unidentified aerial
phenomena (UAP) and the progress of the Department of Defense Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force
(UAPTF) has made in understanding this threat.

This report provides an overview for policymakers of the challenges associated with characterizing the potential threat posed by UAP while also providing a means to develop relevant processes, policies, technologies, and training for the U.S. military and other U.S. Government (USG) personnel if and when they encounter UAP, so as to enhance the Intelligence Community’s (IC) ability to understand the threat. The Director, UAPTF, is the accountable official for ensuring the timely collection and consolidation of data on UAP. The dataset described in this report is currently limited primarily to U.S. Government reporting of incidents occurring from November 2004to March 2021. Data continues to be collected and analyzed.

ODNI prepared this report for the Congressional Intelligence and Armed Services Committees. UAPTF and the ODNI National Intelligence Manager for Aviation drafted this report, with input from USD(I&S), DIA, FBI, NRO, NGA, NSA, Air Force, Army, Navy, Navy/ONI, DARPA, FAA, NOAA, NGA, ODNI/NIM-Emerging and Disruptive Technology, ODNI/National Counterintelligence, and Security Center, and ODNI/National Intelligence Council.

Various forms of sensors that register UAP generally operate correctly and capture enough real data to allow initial assessments, but some UAP may be attributable to sensor anomalies.




The limited amount of high-quality reporting on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) hampers our ability to draw firm conclusions about the nature or intent of UAP. The Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) considered a range of information on UAP described in U.S. military and IC (Intelligence Community) reporting, but because the reporting lacked sufficient specificity, ultimately recognized that a unique, tailored reporting process was required to provide sufficient data for analysis of UAP events.
• As a result, the UAPTF concentrated its review on reports that occurred between 2004
and 2021, the majority of which are a result of this new tailored process to better capture UAP events through formalized reporting.
• Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a majority
of UAP were registered across multiple sensors, including radar, infrared, electro-optical, weapon seekers, and visual observation.

In a limited number of incidents, UAP reportedly appeared to exhibit unusual flight
characteristics. These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception and require additional rigorous analysis.

There are probably multiple types of UAP requiring different explanations based on the range of appearances and behaviors described in the available reporting. Our analysis of the data supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved they will fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, USG, or U.S. industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a catchall “other” bin.

UAP clearly poses a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to U.S. national security.
Safety concerns primarily center on aviators contending with an increasingly cluttered air domain. UAP would also represent a national security challenge if they are foreign adversary collection platforms or provide evidence a potential adversary has developed either a breakthrough or disruptive technology.

Consistent consolidation of reports from across the federal government, standardized reporting, increased collection and analysis, and a streamlined process for screening all such reports against a broad range of relevant USG data will allow for a more sophisticated analysis of UAP that is likely to deepen our understanding. Some of these steps are resource-intensive and would require additional investment.




Limited Data Leaves Most UAP Unexplained…
Limited data and inconsistency in reporting are key challenges to evaluating UAP. No standardized reporting mechanism existed until the Navy established one in March 2019. The Air Force subsequently adopted that mechanism in November 2020, but it remains limited to USG reporting. The UAPTF regularly heard anecdotally during its research about other observations that occurred but which were never captured in formal or informal reporting by those observers.

After carefully considering this information, the UAPTF focused on reports that involved UAP largely witnessed firsthand by military aviators and that were collected from systems we considered to be reliable. These reports describe incidents that occurred between 2004 and 2021, with the majority coming in the last two years as the new reporting mechanism became better known to the military aviation community. We were able to identify one reported UAP with high confidence. In that case, we identified the object as a large, deflating balloon. The others remain unexplained.
• 144 reports originated from USG sources. Of these, 80 reports involved observation
with multiple sensors.
o Most reports described UAP as objects that interrupted pre-planned training or other military activity.

UAP Collection Challenges
Sociocultural stigmas and sensor limitations remain obstacles to collecting data on UAP. Although some technical challenges—such as how to appropriately filter out radar clutter to ensure the safety of flight for military and civilian aircraft—are longstanding in the aviation community, while others are unique to the UAP problem set.
• Narratives from aviators in the operational community and analysts from the military
and IC describes disparagement associated with observing UAP, reporting it, or attempting to discuss it with colleagues. Although the effects of these stigmas have lessened as senior members of the scientific, policy, military, and intelligence communities engage on the topic seriously in public, the reputational risk may keep many observers silent, complicating scientific pursuit of the topic.
• The sensors mounted on U.S. military platforms are typically designed to fulfill
specific missions. As a result, those sensors are not generally suited for identifying UAP.
• Sensor vantage points and the numbers of sensors concurrently observing an object
play substantial roles in distinguishing UAP from known objects and determining whether a UAP demonstrates breakthrough aerospace capabilities. Optical sensors have the benefit of providing some insight into relative size, shape, and structure. Radiofrequency sensors provide more accurate velocity and range information.




But Some Potential Patterns Do Emerge
Although there was wide variability in the reports and the dataset is currently too limited to
allow for detailed trend or pattern analysis, there was some clustering of UAP observations
regarding shape, size, and, particularly, propulsion. UAP sightings also tended to cluster around U.S. training and testing grounds, but we assess that this may result from a collection bias as a result of focused attention, greater numbers of latest-generation sensors operating in those areas, unit expectations, and guidance to reporting anomalies.
And a Handful of UAP Appear to Demonstrate Advanced Technology In 18 incidents, described in 21 reports, observers reported unusual UAP movement patterns or
flight characteristics.

Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings.

The UAPTF holds a small amount of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating acceleration or a degree of signature management. Additional rigorous analyses are necessary by multiple teams or groups of technical experts to determine the nature and validity of these data. We are conducting further analysis to determine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated.

The UAP documented in this limited dataset demonstrates an array of aerial behaviors, reinforcing the possibility there are multiple types of UAP requiring different explanations. Our analysis of the data supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved they will fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, USG or industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a catchall “other” bin. With the exception of the one instance where we determined with high confidence that the reported UAP was airborne clutter, specifically a deflating balloon, we currently lack sufficient information in our dataset to attribute incidents to specific explanations.

Airborne Clutter: These objects include birds, balloons, recreational unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or airborne debris like plastic bags that muddle a scene and affect an operator’s ability to identify true targets, such as enemy aircraft.

Natural Atmospheric Phenomena: Natural atmospheric phenomena include ice crystals, moisture, and thermal fluctuations that may register on some infrared and radar systems.

USG or Industry Developmental Programs: Some UAP observations could be attributable to developments and classified programs by U.S. entities. We were unable to confirm, however, that these systems accounted for any of the UAP reports we collected.

Foreign Adversary Systems: Some UAP may be technologies deployed by China, Russia, another nation, or a non-governmental entity.




Other: Although most of the UAP described in our dataset probably remain unidentified due to limited data or challenges to collection processing or analysis, we may require additional scientific knowledge to successfully collect on, analyze and characterize some of them. We would group such objects in this category pending scientific advances that allowed us to better understand them. The UAPTF intends to focus additional analysis on the small number of cases where a UAP appeared to display unusual flight characteristics or signature management.

UAP poses a hazard to the safety of flight and could pose a broader danger if some instances represent sophisticated collection against U.S. military activities by a foreign government or demonstrate a breakthrough aerospace technology by a potential adversary.

Ongoing Airspace Concerns
When aviators encounter safety hazards, they are required to report these concerns. Depending on the location, volume, and behavior of hazards during incursions on ranges, pilots may cease their tests and/or training and land their aircraft, which has a deterrent effect on reporting.
• The UAPTF has 11 reports of documented instances in which pilots reported near
misses with a UAP.

Potential National Security Challenges
We currently lack data to indicate any UAP is part of a foreign collection program or indicative of a major technological advancement by a potential adversary. We continue to monitor for evidence of such programs given the counterintelligence challenge they would pose, particularly as some UAP have been detected near military facilities or by aircraft carrying the USG’s most advanced sensor systems.

Standardize the Reporting, Consolidate the Data, and Deepen the Analysis
In line with the provisions of Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the IAA for FY 2021, the UAPTF’s long-term goal is to widen the scope of its work to include additional UAP events documented by a broader swath of USG personnel and technical systems in its analysis. As the dataset increases, the UAPTF’s ability to employ data analytics to detect trends will also improve. The initial focus will be to employ artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithms to cluster and recognize similarities and patterns in features of the data points. As the database accumulates information from known aerial objects such as weather balloons, high-altitude or super-pressure balloons, and wildlife, machine learning can add efficiency by pre-assessing UAP reports to see if those records match similar events already in the database.
• The UAPTF has begun to develop interagency analytical and processing workflows to
ensure both collection and analysis will be well informed and coordinated.




The majority of UAP data is from U.S. Navy reporting, but efforts are underway to standardize incident reporting across U.S. military services and other government agencies to ensure all relevant data is captured with respect to particular incidents and any U.S. activities that might be relevant. The UAPTF is currently working to acquire additional reporting, including from the U.S. Air Force (USAF), and has begun receiving data from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

• Although USAF data collection has been limited historically the USAF began a six-
month pilot program in November 2020 to collect in the most likely areas to encounter UAP and is evaluating how to normalize future collection, reporting, and analysis across the entire Air Force.
• The FAA captures data related to UAP during the normal course of managing air traffic
operations. The FAA generally ingests this data when pilots and other airspace users report
unusual or unexpected events to the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization.
• In addition, the FAA continuously monitors its systems for anomalies, generating
additional information that may be of use to the UAPTF. The FAA is able to isolate data of
interest to the UAPTF and make it available. The FAA has a robust and effective outreach program that can help the UAPTF reach members of the aviation community to highlight the importance of
reporting UAP.

Expand Collection
The UAPTF is looking for novel ways to increase the collection of UAP cluster areas when U.S. forces are not present as a way to baseline “standard” UAP activity and mitigate the collection bias in the dataset. One proposal is to use advanced algorithms to search historical data captured and stored by radars. The UAPTF also plans to update its current interagency UAP collection strategy in order to bring to bear relevant collection platforms and methods from the DoD and the IC.

Increase Investment in Research and Development
The UAPTF has indicated that additional funding for research and development could further the future study of the topics laid out in this report. Such investments should be guided by a UAPCollection Strategy, UAP R&D Technical Roadmap, and a UAP Program Plan.




APPENDIX A – Definition of Key Terms
This report and UAPTF databases use the following defining terms:

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP): Airborne objects not immediately identifiable. The car onymUAP represents the broadest category of airborne objects reviewed for analysis.

UAP Event: A holistic description of an occurrence during which a pilot or aircrew witnessed (or detected) a UAP.

UAP Incident: A specific part of the event.

UAP Report: Documentation of a UAP event, to include verified chains of custody and basic
information such as the time, date, location, and description of the UAP. UAP reports include Range Fouler¹ reports and other reporting.

¹ U.S. Navy aviators define a “range fouler” as an activity or object that interrupts pre-planned training or other military activity in a military operating area or restricted airspace.



APPENDIX B – Senate Report Accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, provides that the DNI, in consultation with the SECDEF and other relevant heads of USG Agencies, is to submit an intelligence assessment of the threat posed by UAP and the progress the UAPTF has made to understand this threat.

The Senate Report specifically requested that the report include:

  1. A detailed analysis of UAP data and intelligence reporting collected or held by the Office of
    Naval Intelligence, including data and intelligence reporting held by the UAPTF;
  2. A detailed analysis of unidentified phenomena data collected by:
    a. Geospatial Intelligence;
    b. Signals Intelligence;
    c. Human Intelligence; and
    d. Measurement and Signatures Intelligence
  3. A detailed analysis of data of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which was derived from
    investigations of intrusions of UAP data over restricted U.S. airspace;
  4. A detailed description of an interagency process for ensuring timely data collection and
    centralized analysis of all UAP reporting for the Federal Government, regardless of which service
    or agency acquired the information;
  5. Identification of an official accountable for the process described in paragraph 4;
  6. Identification of potential aerospace or other threats posed by the UAP to national security,
    and an assessment of whether this UAP activity may be attributed to one or more foreign
  7. Identification of any incidents or patterns that indicate a potential adversary, have achieved
    breakthrough aerospace capabilities that could put U.S. strategic or conventional forces at risk; and
  8. Recommendations regarding increased collection of data, enhanced research and development, other resources, and additional funding.

The Government UAP Report is a Predicted Fail. They May as Well be Drunk…Daily.

DNI is Director of National Intelligence. (Cough cough.) Marbles for brains at this rate. Their lies are not intelligent. The truth would be.

I knew it was going to be like this. Be sure to read Dr. Greer’s report.–Greer-s-important-response-to-the-DNI-report.html?soid=1109615552303&aid=Argang17Aw4

As I commented on Corey Goode’s post on LinkedIn, it’s like waiting for an alcoholic mate or parent to come home hoping they won’t physically abuse you. You have to be a serial co-dependent in denial to hope for anything true or good from the U.S. military. You’re hoping in vain. That is not who they are and these guys working in the intel circuit should know this. What’s the problem?

It epitomizes why I won’t listen to cataclysm prediction anymore. On some level they WANT it or they wouldn’t be so enamored and ego invested in it.

People make things happen by what they focus on. We’re unconscious co-creators by default stumbling around in the dark like a loose live wire flailing in a storm. All kinds of power and no idea what to hook it to.

I’m done with destructive, self-destructive and flailing humans. There is no more time. Either you’re grounded in life and light from your core and changing your body and mind, or your mind thinks it’s passively seeing destruction like a movie watcher and it’s not. You’re helping create cataclysm and acting like you’re innocently helping.

Be careful what you focus on now “folks”. We are all creators.

%d bloggers like this: