Watson and Crick Were Silenced by the D.S. And Watson Had His Nobel Prize Taken Away for One Comment he Made. All that and Rosalind Franklin’s Photo 51 was Responsible for SHOWING the Double Helix. She was Ignored. The Three Men Won the Nobel Prize.


I wonder if they worked with Operation Paperclip? This link is really something and just brings up more questions for me. Be sure and look at this website and it’s videos and the video below.

https://dnalc.cshl.edu/view/15470-The-moral-responsibility-of-scientists-in-Nazi-Germany-James-Watson.html

I can hardly stand having this on my computer, it’s such bad energy. This is James Watson; founder of our CURRENT science on DNA? Holy Crap. I 100% disagree with him based on what we know now about the Tzolkin and Time and EPIGENETICS. OUR MINDS and OUR CHOICE control our DNA. We ARE equal in our ability to choose. IMO his statement is ignorant, but none of us are 100% correct. Still, something in humans tells us that because we are all Equally loved and cared for by the Universe, we can make a go of it with what we’ve been given and that has NOTHING to do with our Birth Genes.

Francis Crick and James Watson, Molecular Biologists

The Tzolkin Themeplex for the day of discovery of DNA by Watson and Crick; February 28, 1953

8Histidine is the Amino Acid of a Galactic conflict. Still, at least their work was guided by our Sun. But look at the antipode; 8Threonine is death and change. And there is 6Serine, the Reptilians underneath. It’s pretty straight forward. “You would be wise to keep some of what you see under your hat for now.” The Reptilians back in 1953

1-Crick
Francis Crick in his office in his later years. Author: Marc Lieberman
2-Crick
Francis Crick and James Watson

Crick asked himself how it was possible that nature had simultaneously invented two mutually interdependent elements of life: the genetic material –nucleic acids, such as DNA or RNA– and the mechanism necessary to perpetuate it –the proteins called enzymes–.

The synthesis of the nucleic acids depends on the proteins; the amino acids, but the synthesis of the proteins depends on the nucleic acids. Faced with this chicken-and-egg problem, Crick and his colleague Leslie Orgel reasoned that life should have arisen in a place where there exists a “mineral or compound capable of replacing the function of the enzymes, and from there it would have been disseminated to other planets like Earth by “the deliberate activity of an extraterrestrial society.”

The truth is that directed panspermia does not detract from Crick’s thinking at all. Quite the contrary, it reveals the powerful workings of a theoretical, incisive and restless mind, eager for rational answers, even unconventional ones. To understand how Crick came to the idea of panspermia, we must go back a few years. The son of shoemaker Weston Favell (Northampton, UK), Francis Harry Compton Crick (June 8, 1916 – July 28, 2004) reached the end of his childhood with the main aspects of his identity already defined: his penchant for science. As for the first, he chose physics.

Molecular biology might have lost one of its founding fathers had it not been for the war. Crick began his research at University College, London working on what he described as “the dullest problem imaginable” – measuring the viscosity of water at high pressure and temperature. With the outbreak of World War II, he was drafted into the army to work on the design of mines. After the end of the conflict, he discovered that his equipment had been destroyed by a bomb (in his autobiography he spoke of a “land mine”), which allowed him to leave this tedious research.

Crick then had to choose a new field of research, and that was when he discovered what he called the gossip test: “what you are really interested in is what you gossip about.” In his case it was “the borderline between the living and the nonliving, and the workings of the brain,” in a nutshell – biology, or, as a physicist – biophysics. He began working on the structure of proteins in the Cavendish Laboratory of Cambridge, until he met an American named James Watson, twelve years younger than him but already with a PhD that Crick had not yet obtained for himself. Watson & Crick, and their DNA model in the Cavendish Laboratory (1953). Author: Antony Barrington Brown

The two researchers discovered that they shared a hypothesis. At that time it was believed that the seat of inheritance lay in proteins. Crick and Watson thought that genes resided in that unknown substance of the chromosomes, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). And that conviction, along with the participation of Maurice Wilkins and Rosalind Franklin, would give birth on February 28, 1953 to one of the greatest discoveries of twentieth century science, the double helix of DNA. The work was published in Nature on April 25 of that year. Crick would not obtain his PhD until the following year.

But although Crick is known primarily for being one of the founders of this milestone of molecular biology, the truth is that he himself laid the first rails of this new science. It was he who proposed that DNA was transcribed to RNA and that this was translated by means of adapter molecules in charge of converting the genetic code for proteins, the building blocks of life. And it was this “central dogma” of biology, as he himself baptized it, which led him to publish in 1973 his hypothesis of panspermia, by then such an elegant idea that it even counted astrophysicist Carl Sagan among its proponents.

Only years later would it be discovered that RNA can act by itself as an enzyme without the intervention of proteins, thus solving the problem that inspired panspermia. In 1993, Crick and Orgel published an article that no longer made any mention of an “extraterrestrial society”.  (Who shook that out of them? Scientists have always been pressured to agree with the Government/Military/D.S. narrative)The chicken-and-egg problem “could be resolved if, early in the evolution of life, nucleic acids acted as catalysts,” they wrote.

By this time Crick had changed continents and fields of study; in 1976 he moved to the Salk Institute in La Jolla (California, USA) for a one year sabbatical that would end up lasting for almost three decades. It was there that he settled his unfinished business with the second of his gossips: the brain. For the rest of his career, and in collaboration with neuroscientist Christof Koch, at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), he devoted himself to trying to locate consciousness in the brain matter. “You, your joys and your sorrows, your memories and your ambition, your sense of personal identity and free will, are in fact no more than the behavior of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules,” he wrote in 1994.

He never managed to unravel the problem of consciousness, although he made significant advances in the knowledge of visual perception. In 2004, he lost his battle against colon cancer, but never lost the courage or the passion for the study of life. According to Christof Koch, “he was editing a manuscript on his death bed, a scientist until the bitter end.”

This is from History.com

They saw Rosalind Franklin’s photo 51 of the DNA that SHOWED the double helix just before their announced their discovery. Her student Wilkins showed it to them but she never learned that he did that. Wilkens then shared in the Nobel Price so it was just the three men and Rosalind was ignored.

On February 28, 1953, Cambridge University scientists James D. Watson and Francis H.C. Crick announced that they have determined the double-helix structure of DNA, the molecule containing human genes. The molecular biologists were aided significantly by the work of another DNA researcher, Rosalind Franklin, although she is not included in the announcement, nor did she share the subsequent Nobel Prize award for it.

Though DNA—short for deoxyribonucleic acid—was discovered in 1869, its crucial role in determining genetic inheritance wasn’t demonstrated until 1943. In the early 1950s, Watson and Crick were only two of many scientists working on figuring out the structure of DNA. California chemist Linus Pauling suggested an incorrect model at the beginning of 1953, prompting Watson and Crick to try and beat Pauling at his own game. 

LISTEN NOW: HISTORY This Week Podcast: The DNA Debate

On the morning of February 28, they determined that the structure of DNA was a double-helix polymer, or a spiral of two DNA strands, each containing a long chain of monomer nucleotides, wound around each other. According to their findings, DNA replicated itself by separating into individual strands, each of which became the template for a new double helix. In his best-selling book, The Double Helix (1968), Watson later claimed that Crick announced the discovery by walking into the nearby Eagle Pub and blurting out that “we had found the secret of life.” The truth wasn’t that far off, as Watson and Crick had solved a fundamental mystery of science–how it was possible for genetic instructions to be held inside organisms and passed from generation to generation.

Watson and Crick’s solution was formally announced on April 25, 1953, following its publication in that month’s issue of Nature magazine. The article revolutionized the study of biology and medicine. Among the developments that followed directly from it were pre-natal screening for disease genes; genetically engineered foods; the ability to identify human remains; the rational design of treatments for diseases such as AIDS; and the accurate testing of physical evidence in order to convict or exonerate criminals.

Crick and Watson later had a falling-out over Watson’s book, which Crick felt misrepresented their collaboration and betrayed their friendship. 

A larger controversy arose over the use Watson and Crick made of work done by another DNA researcher, Rosalind Franklin. Colleague Maurice Wilkins showed Watson and Crick Franklin’s X-ray photographic work to Watson just before he and Crick made their famous discovery. The imagery established that the DNA molecule existed in a helical conformation. When Crick and Watson won the Nobel Prize in 1962, they shared it with Wilkins. Franklin, who died in 1958 of ovarian cancer and was thus ineligible for the award, never learned of the role her photos played in the historic scientific breakthrough.

Citation Information

Article Title

Chemical structure of DNA discovered

Author

History.com Editors

Website Name

HISTORY

URL

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/watson-and-crick-discover-chemical-structure-of-dna

Access Date

March 22, 2021

Publisher

A&E Television Networks

Last Updated

March 2, 2021

Original Published Date

November 24, 2009TAGSSCIENCEBY HISTORY.COM EDITORS

© 2021 A&E Television Networks, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sunday; Red 9 Solar Earth.Today’s Gateway is governed July 4, 1776, the Signing of the Declaration of INDEPENDENCE.


Ben Franklin, John Adams, and the writer, Thomas Jefferson editing the Declaration.

Before Ben Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson edited the Declaration, my ancestors in Norfolk, England, specifically the exchequer for the Crown, Charles Townsend, stirred up rebellion on our soil by trying to tax tea and thus the Boston Tea Party ensued. Yeah, he was a cousin. I quote History.com below.

Townshend Duties

“The Townshend Acts, named after Charles Townshend, British chancellor of the Exchequer, imposed duties on British china, glass, lead, paint, paper and tea imported to the colonies.

Benjamin Franklin had informed the British Parliament that the colonies intended to start manufacturing their own goods rather than paying duties on imports. These particular items were chosen for taxation because Townshend thought they would be difficult things for the colonists to produce on their own. He estimated the duties would raise approximately 40,000 pounds, with most of the revenue coming from tea.

While the original intent of the import duties had been to raise revenue, Charles Townshend saw the policies as a way to remodel colonial governments. The Townshend Acts would use the revenue raised by the duties to pay the salaries of colonial governors and judges, ensuring the loyalty of America’s governmental officials to the British Crown. However, these policies prompted colonists to take action by boycotting British goods.

Charles Townshend didn’t live to see the measures enacted. He died suddenly in September 1767, before the detrimental effects of his signature rules could materialize.”

July 4, 1776. Red 9 Earth
I pulse in order to evolve, Realizing synchronicity I seal the matrix of navigation with the solar tone of intention. I am guided by the power of SPACE or 3D.

The analog today is White 9 Solar Wind and we are currently under the effects of our Great Central Sun’s CME’s and Solar wind stirring the pot before this important election. The wind is blowing fierce here in Michigan. This is a big synchronicity. The people are about to express their wishes for this Republic that has lost it’s Democratic way. I wish it were not so but I am a realist.

We have to re-establish our independence in two days; Blue 11 Spectral Storm, from international human trafficking, the most evil abuse of children beyond what any American imagines, corrupt lawmakers, and a Catholic Church steeped in pedophilia and a possible sponsor of the trafficking. Add to that the normalization of incest in American families and our democracy is being ripped asunder by the abuse and misalignment of the body. Hmmm, who profits from that? Sick-care industry. They’re great if you get into a vehicular accident or fall out of a tree but that’s it.

The Guide Power is Red 9 Solar Skywalker who has the guts to say what no one else will. We are all each responsible for the condition of our body. Genetic Determinism is dead, our lifestyle sets the tone, only we choose what to put in our mouth, and there is no lack of holistic practitioners to choose from who will empower and teach you how to take care of yourself. You just have to independently navigate your own body with their help. You need not be afraid of a virus. You do need to be afraid of your own lack of ACTION on behalf of your own immune system which handily deals with any toxic virus or bacteria if you just shore it up.

The antipode is Blue 9 Hand; knowing, healing and accomplishing. We have a long way to go releasing the programming from media, sick-care and state regarding the lies about how weak and stupid we are. It’s immensely profitable for them to convince us that we have to take marching orders and comply because we’re too weak and dumb to do otherwise. Yeah, that will crack The Republic to its foundation. Then the addiction to alcohol and opiates starts.

The Hidden Wisdom is Yellow 5 Overtone Seed. It’s time to set a radiant focused intention or target to germinate in the blessed dark up until Winter Solstice, December 21, 2020. That’s a big day for all of us. Many things will be released.

The Fifth Dimensional GForce is Blue 5 Overtone Night. There is the Radiant Dark of Night of which I just spoke. It’s the dimensional soil that will germinate the radiant seed. But we have to do it.

Keep it simple. FOCUS on your OWN BODY. What is your dream for your body, your health, your mind, how you feel? What do you believe is IMPOSSIBLE? GIVE IT UP. Give it up to earth, the sun, the wind, the soil, or throw it in the ocean or a volcano. Then get busy. Write down a plan. Are you going to just WALK for 10 minutes a day? That’s a start. SET A TIME and start today, not tomorrow. Cut down 2 cigarettes? Drink 2 more glasses of water? Stop eating sugar? Start keeping a journal of how you’re going to love your body and you’re on your way.

Yoga.

Essay; Camille Paglia-Some Great Reading for the Weekend


Camille-Paglia

Click here for the full interview for your reading pleasure this weekend.

Camille Paglia-EXCELLENT!

Paglia is an essayist, author, and professor of humanities at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, where she has taught since 1984. She completed her Ph.D. at Yale under the supervision of Harold Bloom, author of The Western Canon. Her first book, Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence, from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinsonwas listed by David Bowie as one of “100 books we should all read.” 

Her other books include Break, Blow, Burn, a close-reading of 43 classic poems, and Glittering Images: A Journey Through Art from Egypt to Star Wars. In recent years, her essays have been collected and published in new editions, including Free Women, Free Men: Sex, Gender, and Feminism (February 2018) and Provocations: Collected Essays on Art, Feminism, Politics, Sex, and Education, which was released by Pantheon in October 2018.

“I thought Derrida and DeMan and the rest of that crew were arrant nonsense from the start, a pedantic diversion from direct engagement with art. About the obsequious Yale welcome given to the prattlings of one continental “star” visitor, I acidly remarked to a fellow grad student sitting next to me, “They’re like high priests murmuring to each other.”

Love it.

Nevertheless, the poisons of post-structuralism have now spread throughout academe and have done enormous damage to basic scholarly standards and disastrously undermined belief even in the possibility of knowledge. I suspect history will not be kind to the leading professors who appear to have put loyalty to friends and colleagues above defending scholarly values during a chaotic era of overt vandalism that has deprived several generations of students of a profound education in the humanities. The steady decline in humanities majors is an unmistakable signal that this once noble field has become a wasteland.”

Anything focused on real intelligence, literacy, and human beings have been thrown to the wayside.  Mediocrity or below rules the day.

The headlong rush to judgment by so many well-educated, middle-class women in the #MeToo movement has been startling and dismaying. Their elevation of emotion and group solidarity over fact and logic has resurrected damaging stereotypes of women’s irrationality that were once used to deny us the vote. I found the blanket credulity given to women accusers during the recent U.S. Senate confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh positively unnerving: it was the first time since college that I truly understood the sexist design of Aeschylus’s Oresteia, whose mob of vengeful Furies is superseded by formal courts of law, where evidence is weighed.”

WOW!!

What I see spreading among professional middle-class women is a bitter resentment toward men that is in many cases unjust and misplaced. With divorce so easy since the sexual revolution, women find themselves competing with younger women in new and cruel ways. Agrarian women gained power as they aged: young women were brainless pawns whose marriages, pregnancies, childcare, cooking, and other chores were acerbically supervised and controlled by the dictatorial crones (forces of nature whom I fondly remember from childhood).

In short, #MeToo from a historical perspective is a cri de coeur from women who are realizing that the sexual revolution that many of us had once ecstatically embraced has in key ways devalued women, confused their private relationships, and complicated their smooth functioning in the workplace. It’s time for a new map of the gender world.”

She’s speakin’ it. On many points, I agree with her. Crack a book, folks; female and male.