Fauci Testimony ‘Not Credible’ in Light of Other Evidence: Lawyers


Dr. Chavez mentioned Dr. Shi Zheng-li in one of his letters to the Feds.

Here is my blog post where Dr.Chavez cited Shi Zheng-Li. I remembered her name correctly from 3 years ago.

Anti-Covid19 v.2

The biggest shot in variation, when it is compared to the first sequence obtained of the virus of COVID-19, with its immediate ancestor, that according to Shi Zheng-Li is the RaTG13 (submitted a posteriori of the COVID-19 first sequence, and which researchers demonstrate that this is a partially made-up sequence (see below), having her deliberately ignored even to cite her previous identical reference called BtCoV/4991 (2016), or even her most recent reference of the same that she put under the name of SARSr-CoV Ra4991 (2019), being very dishonest for her to change in at least three identified times the names of her same sequence, actions that render her highly suspicious, because she hid the rest of the sequence at least during the last four year (having been obtained from excrement in a cave, she says. After a call due to a serious case of miners infected at Yunnan. Nobody knows what was inside at least six miners), but her publishing it until now, after the emergence of a similar virus, makes her highly suspicious, rather than making her look innocent. Who can say that she did not manipulate as well artificially such sequence, or that the CCP Chinese military did not do the same to the other two previous sequences that are also somehow similar to Sars-CoV-2

Expert in Data Analysis

Lockdowns, masks, boosters and mRNA vaccines make life worse not better.

This is what they tried and did do to us and people trusted them. How ironic that it wastes our Time and hurt our DNA. (not mine. I didn’t do it)Waste and hurt is our leaders agenda for all DNA life on Earth. They need to go.

Millions of us knew better and get hate mail and banned from social media. The rest did as they were told.

%d bloggers like this: