NYTimes: A Diverse Supreme Court Questions the Value of Diversity

A Diverse Supreme Court Questions the Value of Diversity https://nyti.ms/3fsZ2xa

If diversity was defined by DNA and not surface appearance or gender, humans would see there is very little difference between us, meaning 98% the same genetically. That probably goes for E.T. humanoids as well. They are our E.T. ancestors and love us.

But for some strange reason, maybe our mirror neurons in our brains, earth humans note different appearance and make biased judgments based on that. The N.Y. Times has done it here. The whole media does it, all the time and it’s completely incorrect.

The assumptions about a person’s culture based on appearance are the worst. There are plenty of black people raised very much in the white culture with white values but that depends on class. Poor whites, middle class whites or rich whites? The same can be brought to every single ethnic culture based on economics. Money is the big dividing line in how people are raised and treated, more than culture.

Then consider that many people had parents from two different cultures so they are bi-racial but only appear so. Maybe their parents appear opposite but values and experience are the same culture for them. You must open your mind to real diversity which is INSIDE, not outside.

You get my drift. Don’t make assumptions about people based on APPEARANCE. Especially with humanoids walking the planet, we’re about to get a real lesson in diversity. Meaning, the Andromedan you meet looks completely human, and they do, but then they let you know they were not born in this galaxy…

Earthlings have maybe 10 years to get a basic grip on this.

I’m here to help, and as far as I know I’m an earth human, but patients don’t think so.😉

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: